- From: Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:02:24 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Who is the intended audience for the profiles list? I see two different answers, with different rationales, that seem somewhat conflated together in the issue (and supporting use cases and discussion) a) Machines -- in order to request an appropriate profile, the client software needs to be able to discover, retrieve and interpret a list of identifiers for the available profiles, in order to use the chosen identifier to request the correct representation. This seems essential, given that there isn't a central registry of profiles like there are for languages, media types and so forth. In the same way as a 300 HTTP response, a list of options seems necessary. b) Humans -- A short definition and editing guidance seem appropriate for humans, but almost certainly irrelevant to machines. Yet these are mentioned explicitly in the issue. Some unpacking of the issue might help? -- GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/73#issuecomment-399242532 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2018 21:02:27 UTC