Re: Agenda Tuesday 19 June

Antoine, I will try to gather comments from the Google Doc to inform our
discussion. For any requirements that we cannot quickly vote up or down,
 we can open a github issue and I'll try to carry over any prior
discussion. The hope is that we can do a first pass triage of the
requirements deciding "in scope" "out of scope" "needs discussion".

 kc

On 6/18/18 1:23 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I have to send regrets for this call. I am in another, all-day meeting,
> I may be able to follow on IRC but certainly not connect by audio.
> 
> I was wondering, what is now the best way for putting comments on the
> requirements to be discussed, so that they're easily picked up by the
> group in a call, when one cannot q+ to voice them?
> 
> There's
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/13hV2tJ6Kg2Hfe7e1BowY5QfCIweH9GxSCFQV1aWtOPg
> of course, but there are several places there where comments can be put
> (in the first list, in the categorized list, and in the use cases
> themselves). As a matter of fact I've put comments really deep in the
> document, and I'm not sure the group has the time to check everything
> during calls.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Antoine
> 
> On 18/06/18 03:48, Karen Coyle wrote:
>> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2018.06.19
>>
>> We will continue to work through the requirements for the profiles
>> guidance deliverable, with requirements for content negotiation to
>> follow.
>>
> 
> 

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600

Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2018 14:35:53 UTC