- From: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:04:20 +1000
- To: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Cc: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 4 June 2018 22:05:16 UTC
The proposed narrowing of dct:Standard may be an issue - we may need to re-introduce an appropriate term. I think specification is a more general term that probably helps clarify, On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 at 07:07 Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote: > @aisaac said: > > > @kcoyle I don't know. I thought our definition was using "standard". > Anyway, whatever we name it, a standard MUST be based on something :-) > > What about using "specification" instead of "standard"? > > -- > GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego > Please view or discuss this issue at > https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/242#issuecomment-394499817 using your > GitHub account > >
Received on Monday, 4 June 2018 22:05:16 UTC