- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 22:12:11 +0200
- To: <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Hi Karen, Sorry I won't be able to do it. I'm trying my best to find time for the Europeana requirement analysis, which I'm very late on :-( And honestly my concern was a true one. I was happy with your answer for the general approach, but honestly I'm not sure what Jaro meant for some specific categories. Antoine On 04/06/18 21:16, Karen Coyle wrote: > Antoine, could you make that change? We need to be ready to discuss > these in about 24 hours and I'd like to avoid discussing the categories > rather than the actual requirements. > > kc > > On 6/4/18 9:42 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd echo Annette's concern here. Karen's answer was good enough for me, >> but Jaro's categorization is really too general. It's about functions >> like "Data creation and maintenance", "querying" etc. Can expressions >> like 'profile' and 'data expressed according to a profile' be employed >> to clarify the categories? This would make them longer, but at least >> we'd have a clearer idea of what (and what for) the requirements apply to. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Antoine >> >> On 01/06/18 19:28, Jaroslav Pullmann wrote: >>> >>> Dear Karen, dear all >>> >>> here are the same categories with an attempt to consolidate the >>> various wordings I collected across GitHub, the F2F wiki and UCR >>> document [1]. >>> Despite the peculiar approach the groupings might be of >>> informative value for our requirements discussion. Requirements are >>> colored in red, yet >>> unclear statements in gray and the context is enclosed by comment >>> signs. >>> >>> Best regards >>> Jaro >>> >>> [1] >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1viuNJx_2dhSoEVOkjCG7cuuqzUqqR7fr4LvmP-t7T2A/edit# >>> >>> >>> On Friday, June 1, 2018 15:54 CEST, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2018.06.05 >>>> >>>> Jaroslav organized the requirements into categories, and the first few >>>> categories are in the agenda for our discussion. PLEASE take a look at >>>> them and be ready to vote. We will try to vote on entire categories >>>> unless there are objections to specific requirements. If you will not be >>>> at the meeting but wish to comment or vote, you may do so in email and >>>> we will do our best to include your views. >>>> -- >>>> Karen Coyle >>>> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net >>>> m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) >>>> skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600 >>>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Monday, 4 June 2018 20:12:50 UTC