Re: dxwg-ACTION-78: Bring a short definition of profile that we can "vote" on next week from Rob Atkinson on 2018-01-23 (public-dxwg-wg@w3.org from January 2018)

From: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 23:07:11 +0000
To: Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CACfF9Lx++3Wc6PLUyQvC7LO0=5DC4+2aJH0r-rqg=eU06JdGnw@mail.gmail.com>

I dont think there is much inconsistent across different viewpoints, just
different focii on partial vs. complete specification that can be resolved
by defining an "application profile" as a special case of profile that has
a complete set of constraints for a given application domain.

Have updated page with a proposal:

https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/ProfileContext

On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 at 08:55 Dataset Exchange Working Group Issue Tracker <
sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> dxwg-ACTION-78: Bring a short definition of profile that we can "vote" on
> next week
>
> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/78
>
> Assigned to: Rob Atkinson
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2018 23:08:00 UTC