- From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:41:22 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
First, thanks for the diagrams! I always find pictures helpful. I don't think you need the sub-classing of dct:standard to dcat:Resource. The profile can be a sub-class of both. So the arrow from dct:Standard could instead be moved to Profile, and it then is a subclass of both dct:Standard and dcat:Resource, and no statements need to be made to subclass dct:Standard to any DCAT classes. This makes it, semantically, a "standard resource", which I think is a great way to define it. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/279#issuecomment-417722427 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 31 August 2018 16:41:23 UTC