- From: Jakub Klímek via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 05:45:51 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@dr-shorthair This seems clean and reasonable. 1. What do you think of designating the `dcat:Resource` and `dcat:Representation` abstract, so that if anything else pops out (like a Profile), a subclass of Resource has to be created for that, so that it is clear what it is - i.e. discourage creating instances of just `dcat:Resource` and `dcat:Representation`? 2. Doesn't this align with the FRBR approach? Shouldn't it be reused in a more explicit way? -- GitHub Notification of comment by jakubklimek Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/317#issuecomment-417558335 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 31 August 2018 05:46:22 UTC