- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:33:50 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
If we need to allow for representations of things other than `Datasets` then I think we need a super-class of `dcat:Distribution` and a corresponding super-property associated with `dcat:Resource` - perhaps like this: ![Resource + Representation](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/dcat/UML/Resource%2BRepresentation.png) We already have ``` dcat:Dataset rdfs:subClassOf dcat:Resource . ``` This would just add the complementary ``` dcat:Distribution rdfs:subClassOf dcat:Representation . dcat:distribution rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:hasRepresentation . ``` Then if any new type of thing is also catalogued as an individual of a subclass of `dcat:Resource` (such as a profile) then a representation of this can be associated without forcing everything into the `Dataset` and `Distribution` boxes. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/317#issuecomment-417501215 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2018 23:34:22 UTC