Re: [dxwg] Generalize dcat:byteSize to dcat:size

Yes, we opened the issue to investigate if the property ```dcat:size``` plus a unit of measurement provided more flexibility than ```dcat:byteSize``` but we tracked back the reasons why ```dcat:size``` was deprecated (e.g. it would usually require the use of a blank node, see link above for more info). So, unless you (or others) think it would be necessary, I don't think we need to undeprecate ```dcat:size```. 

I wonder though if with the current representation is too cumbersome (or if there are limitations) to represent dataset distributions that are actually terabytes of data  (e.g. multi-dimensional microscopy images can weigh up to several TB each and datasets can be hundreds of TB in total). 

GitHub Notification of comment by agbeltran
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 30 August 2018 07:57:06 UTC