W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > August 2018

Re: [dxwg] Use of dct:type with both Class and Concept

From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 06:31:42 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-417205060-1535610701-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
It sounds like the nice solution would be if dct:type was relaxed to range rdfs:Resource

However - it is legal to have a skos:Concept as the target of dct:type - it just needs to be recognised that the intent is thus to treat these targets as rdfs:Classes too.

If the target is declared to be both a skos:Concept and a rdfs:Class already - then having two different predicates adds a complication - do you need to fill in both?

If we want to enforce an OWL-DL compatible profile of DCAT. whereby referenced resources are also resolved to return OWL-DL compatible resources, how do we specify this, enforce it and validate it? This is why I think there needs to be an explict Use Case for OWL-DL semantics to give us requirements - because the current examples are not "used in a wrong way" - they are just used in an OWL-Full way, and nothing at this stage says this is actually wrong AFAICT. 

So, if we are to support an OWL-DL compatibility constraint, we need to establish the exact requirements and explore available solutions.  A new predicate is a specific solution to a requirement we dont formally recognise (at this stage) IMHO.

If we have such a requirement, we then need to make a decision if this is a matter for DCAT core or for a profile of DCAT. 

Perhaps writing a OWL-DL profile of DCAT - that enforces such constraints would be a good exercise anyway - then we can consider how much could be migrated to DCAT core, but right now we are guessing a little how it would be testable in practice, which is a requirement for W3C reccomendations.

GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/314#issuecomment-417205060 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2018 06:31:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:24 UTC