W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > August 2018

Re: [dxwg] Profile description model and vocabulary

From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 12:46:28 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-416570334-1535460387-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The options are indeed the question - and they implicate whether or not we can provide any recommendations about the accepted requirements. We may choose not to offer suggested solutions where none is identified.

However, I think the separation of these concerns is false - profileDesc is providing an option for a solution for the first two concerns, where no other option has yet been identified,  and is only "conflated" in that sense, its not a separate concern nor an alternative solution - its a direct response to the requirements arising from these.

Then, "description" and a "model for description" to separate - you cant have a description without a model for that description. And if that model is not published in a formalism you simply cant have an interoperable description.

GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/323#issuecomment-416570334 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2018 12:46:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:05 UTC