Re: [profgui] Outlines and requirements

You may have confused this with Action 171, which is assigned to Antoine:

ACTION-171: Create outline in profile guidance doc based on issue 196

But which he told me he did not get to before his holiday. I don't know
exactly what he was planning to do - issue 196[1] should be linked to
issue 242 which has four different outlines.[2] From his comments I'm
assuming he was looking at the last one.[3] All of these are in the
round-up wiki page.[4]

I think we need to wait for Antoine to return to get an answer. (That's
Sept 6 as I recall.)

kc
[1] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/196
[2] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/242
[3] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/242#issuecomment-409352612
[4] https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/ProfileRoundup

On 8/23/18 10:35 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> Nick, here are your actions from the profiles guidance meeting:
> 
>     ncar list other profiles in profileDesc space
>     ncar do examples for the plenary of options for profileDesc
> 
> Action 167 is from the conneg group:
> 
> ACTION-167: Create a draft of the conneg guidance doc for next conneg
> meeting
> 
> Is this what you are referring to? It may be hard to keep the sub-group
> actions straight.
> 
> kc
> 
> On 8/23/18 10:00 PM, Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park) wrote:
>> I have an action (dxwg-ACTION-167) to create a guidance document which I've arranged with the profiling editors means updating the HTML/ReSpec doc in here: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/tree/gh-pages/profiles. There is already a shell there but it needs urgent updating so I'll do that in the first few days of next week as for that action and also as a follow-on from the Profile Guidance meeting just had.
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> 
>> Sent: Friday, 24 August 2018 4:11 AM
>> To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
>> Subject: [profgui] Outlines and requirements
>>
>> At the profile guidance meeting yesterday it was suggested that we fit the requirements into the profile guidance document and use those to help us add content. [1]
>>
>> We have 5 different outlines for the document,[2] plus one in the document itself[3]. I could make a document with at least some of these outlines with the related requirements embedded in them so that we could look at them. However, I don't know where I would put them when done - revise the github comments that have outlines? create a wiki page with them? create separate github issues for each one? [4]
>>
>> What's the best way to make these readable and understandable and community editable? What would folks like to see?
>>
>> kc
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2018/08/22-profgui-minutes.html
>> [2] https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/ProfileRoundup
>> [3] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profiles/
>> [4] I think it's easier to view these together for comparison, so separate github issues might be hard to view. However, separate issues may make it easier to discuss them.
>> --
>> Karen Coyle
>> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
>> m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
>> skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
>>
> 

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600

Received on Friday, 24 August 2018 06:13:06 UTC