I don't know if this helps or hurts in this particular situation, but note that the DCMI community is on the verge of revising DC Terms to move from the standard RDF "range" definitions to a schema.org-like use of "expected values". This means that the stated "range" would no longer be suitable for inferencing (IMO) but instead serves the role of conformance. I believe the upshot of this is that all properties with "expected values" would be annotation properties. This has not yet been entirely agreed, but is currently under discussion. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/314#issuecomment-414343228 using your GitHub accountReceived on Monday, 20 August 2018 14:49:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:24 UTC