Re: [dxwg] Temporal coverage [RTC] from Stijn Goedertier via GitHub on 2018-04-19 (public-dxwg-wg@w3.org from April 2018)

From: Stijn Goedertier via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 10:40:21 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-382689969-1524134420-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

As suggested in the use case [Modeling temporal coverage [ID27]](https://www.w3.org/TR/dcat-ucr/#ID27), [owl:time](https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/) can be used. Would the below example be a correct representation of a coverage for the year 2016 and 2018?

```
@prefix time: <http://www.w3.org/2006/time#>.
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/>.
@prefix dcat: <http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#>.
[]  a dcat:Dataset;
 dcterms:temporal [
  a dcterms:PeriodOfTime ;
  time:hasTime [
   a time:TemporalEntity ; 
   time:hasBeginning [ time:inXSDDate "2018-01-01"];
   time:hasEnd [ time:inXSDDate "2018-12-31"]
  ] ; 
  time:hasTime [
   a time:TemporalEntity ; 
   time:hasBeginning [ time:inXSDDate "2016-01-01"];
   time:hasEnd [ time:inXSDDate "2016-12-31"]
  ] 
 ].
```

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by stijngoedertier
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/85#issuecomment-382689969 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 19 April 2018 10:40:25 UTC