W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > April 2018

Re: [dxwg] Definition of "Schema" (as opposed to profile)

From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 16:25:58 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-382055502-1523982356-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
On 17/04/18 17:15, Peter.Winstanley@gov.scot wrote:
> Antoine
> Can we get any mileage out of other similar terms such as 'pattern' or 'design' or even 'archetype'/'prototype'?

I'm not sure: these sounds like quite abstract resources. I guess that with 'schema' @larsgsvensson wanted to reflect that the thing is processable. Actually maybe 'Processable Profile Implementation' would be suitable?

GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/195#issuecomment-382055502 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2018 16:26:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:02 UTC