W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > April 2018

Re: Any objection to one more small change before FPWD?

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 11:56:00 +0200
To: <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6e244f37-0bbc-04c0-bcac-197c506de6a5@few.vu.nl>
Hi everyone,

As someone who couldn't follow very closely the discussions in the past two weeks maybe I can provide a neutral perspective ;-)

If the changes are the ones at
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/183/files
then I don't see any obvious reason to object. They do not change the vocabulary/model at this stage, and are well substantiated by reference to issues/cases.

Antoine

On 06/04/18 09:33, Simon.Cox@csiro.au wrote:
> One more time:
> 
> ØSo we now make a request to the DXWG full group to accept this ‘friendly amendment’ from the DCAT team, with respect to the FPWD. Any objections?
> 
> See details below.
> 
> *From:*Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton)
> *Sent:* Thursday, 5 April, 2018 07:12
> *To:* public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
> *Cc:* Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>; Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
> *Subject:* [DCAT] - meeting 2018-04-04 summary
> 
> Minutes here https://www.w3.org/2018/04/04-dxwgdcat-minutes.html
> 
> One important matter: a proposed change to the DCAT ED was introduced as https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌pull/‌183 - it merely notes the agreement to expand scope of DCAT catalogue see resolutions 3-6 from https://www.w3.org/2018/03/28-dxwgdcat-minutes#x10. A preview of the PR is here: https://rawgit.com/w3c/dxwg/dcat-catalog-scope-simon/dcat/index.html#vocabulary-overview and here https://rawgit.com/w3c/dxwg/dcat-catalog-scope-simon/dcat/index.html#class-catalog
> 
> However, that resolution was after the resolution to move the ED to FPWD. Nevertheless, the DCAT team agreed that it would be best if this was included in the version of the document published by W3C as FPWD – see https://www.w3.org/2018/04/04-dxwgdcat-minutes.html#x11
> 
> So we now make a request to the DXWG full group to accept this ‘friendly amendment’ from the DCAT team, with respect to the FPWD. Any objections?
> 
> After that, most of the discussion was about license, the options provided by formal rights expressions (ODRL), and finally resolving the issue about where licenses are attached (Distributions, not Datasets).
> 
> Now Makx will learn some Git flow …
> 
> *Simon J D Cox *
> 
> Research Scientist - Environmental Informatics
> 
> Team Leader – Environmental Information Infrastructure
> 
> CSIRO Land and Water <http://www.csiro.au/Research/LWF>
> 
> *E*simon.cox@csiro.au <mailto:simon.cox@csiro.au> *T*+61 3 9545 2365 *M*+61 403 302 672
> 
> /Mail:/Private Bag 10, Clayton South, Vic 3169
> 
> /   Visit: /Central Reception,//Research Way, Clayton, Vic 3168
> 
> /   Deliver: /Gate 3, Normanby Road, Clayton, Vic 3168
> 
> people.csiro.au/Simon-Cox <http://people.csiro.au/Simon-Cox>
> 
> orcid.org/0000-0002-3884-3420 <http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3884-3420>
> 
> researchgate.net/profile/Simon_Cox3 <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Simon_Cox3>
> 
> github.com/dr-shorthair <https://github.com/dr-shorthair>
> 
> lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/agents/Simon%20Cox <http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/agents/Simon%20Cox>
> 
> Twitter @dr_shorthair <https://twitter.com/dr_shorthair>
> 
> Skype dr_shorthair <skype:dr_shorthair>
> 
> https://xkcd.com/1810/
> 
> *PLEASE NOTE*
> 
> The information contained in this email may be confidential or privileged. Any unauthorised use or disclosure is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by return email. Thank you. To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that the communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.
> 
> /Please consider the environment before printing this email./
> 
Received on Friday, 6 April 2018 09:56:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 October 2019 00:15:42 UTC