- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 21:06:49 -0500
- To: "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
I'm sorry I missed the last meeting, so I might be repeating something that was already said, but... I think it would be helpful if the requirement "headings" were stated as requirements. That way we could look at the list of requirements and it would make sense. As an example, we have: ---- 6.17 Cite datasets Provide a way to specify information required for data citation (e.g., dataset authors, title, publication year, publisher, persistent identifier) ---- I would modify this to be something like: ---- 6.17 Provide full citation information for datasets Currently missing from DCAT are: - full range of identifiers, - dates, - contributors and - resources supported by [DataCite] ---- (I copied from the use case - that list of missing may not be correct. This is just an example.) Some requirements are already worded this way, like: 6.3 Create a way to list the profiles implemented by a dataset or a specific distribution If this makes sense, I may be able to make a number of suggestions before the next meeting. -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2017 02:07:59 UTC