- From: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:49:16 +0000
- To: kcoyle@kcoyle.net
- Cc: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2017 20:50:15 UTC
Its commented out already AFIACT? I have however updated the UCR document to group all requirements under the hadings as per the spreadsheet - except for " Formal description 6.22 Link related datasets which i put under Relationships ... Rob On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 at 05:06 Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: > Requirement 6.8.1 has not been voted on, as we are waiting for more > detail / clarification on its meaning. Could a note to this effect be > included in the UCR document? It is listed under "Unclassified", but all > other requirements there have been voted on, so the status of this one > needs to be made clear. The spreadsheet is the only record that shows > that it is undecided, and as the numbering has changed, it becomes > difficult to move from one to the other. > > Thank you. > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) > skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600 <+1%20510-984-3600> > >
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2017 20:50:15 UTC