- From: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 23:54:28 +0200
- To: Jaroslav Pullmann <jaroslav.pullmann@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Cc: Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKckEu5_NTx0jK03a3NXDWS-RU5Tu2OTLdLwZdt7fAiXK=BTcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Jaro, I don't think you can say that DCAT Datasets are mainly raw data. There all kinds of things modelled as DCAT Datasets. I recently heard about Apache log files that are published as DCAT Datasets. I keep saying that it's really difficult, maybe even impossible, to find limits to what a DCAT Dataset is. Also note that ADMS-AP 2.0 is really a DCAT Application Profile as it models the Assets directly as DCAT Datasets where version 1.0 modelled them as ADMS Assets. Makx Op 17 aug. 2017 11:39 p.m. schreef "Jaroslav Pullmann" < jaroslav.pullmann@fit.fraunhofer.de>: > > Hallo Makx, > > thank you for the valuable pointer! Since we several times informally > mentioned the importance of > modeling software related to processing / production / delivery of data > I hoped this topic was of a broader > interest. > > Let me better understand what distinguishes DCAT Dataset from ADMS > Asset and when the latter is applicable: > > "Therefore the difference in user expectation is at the heart of what > distinguishes ADMS as a profile of DCAT". > > With a target domain of eGovernment in mind ADMS seems to target end > users interested in immediate reading, > intellectual consumption (or execution) of "assets" and not in their > arbitrary processing. Applications used for this > purpose are commonly known and self-evident (text editor, web browser > etc.). DCAT Datasets (Assets's superclass) > seem to be more a "raw data", less suitable for humans than for tools > and algorithms, right? > > Best regards > Jaroslav > > > > > > > On Thursday, August 17, 2017 18:27 CEST, "Makx Dekkers" < > mail@makxdekkers.com> wrote: > > > Jaro, > > > > I think you refer to my comment in one of the calls about the use of a > DCAT Application Profile for software. > > > > My comment was about the Application Profile of ADMS, which is a > specialisation of DCAT, called ADMS-AP, that is used in the aggregation of > information about interoperability assets (controlled vocabularies, > metadata schemas) and software solutions by the federated repositories on > the Joinup platform, https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/catalogue/repository. > > > > The specification can be found at https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/ > asset/adms/asset_release/adms-ap-joinup-version-20. > > > > HTH, > > > > Makx. > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jaroslav Pullmann [mailto:jaroslav.pullmann@fit.fraunhofer.de] > > Sent: 16 August 2017 11:26 > > To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > > Subject: Modeling relationship between data and data-oriented software > > > > > > Dear WG members, > > > > as part of my research I am considering the relationship between > data sets and data-oriented software > > and how this might be modeled in a consistent and uniform way. Based > on the UC descriptions (ID8: scope > > of dataset, ID20: resources different from datasets, ID9: link to > software used to produce data) and our > > discussions there seem to be at least the following ways of looking > at this relationship: > > > > - Software as asset: Software being described as the central, > promoted asset (Dataset) > > - Software as part of provenance (past): Software used to > produce/process particular Dataset > > - Software as service: (future): Software that might be used for > particular processing of a Dataset > > > > Are you aware of related research, standards or usage examples (I > assume it was Simon mentioning a company > > using DCAT to describe software distributions)? Particularly > interesting is the modeling of data processing > > services, their semantics ("transform", "aggregate") and the relation > to data (parameters) they operate upon. > > > > Many thanks > > Jaro > > > > -- > > Jaroslav Pullmann > > Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT > User-Centered Ubiquitous Computing Schloss Birlinghoven | D-53757 Sankt > Augustin | Germany > > Phone: +49-2241-143620 | Fax: +49-2241-142146 > > > > > > > > -- > Jaroslav Pullmann > Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT > User-Centered Ubiquitous Computing > Schloss Birlinghoven | D-53757 Sankt Augustin | Germany > Phone: +49-2241-143620 | Fax: +49-2241-142146 > > >
Received on Thursday, 17 August 2017 21:54:51 UTC