- From: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 23:54:28 +0200
- To: Jaroslav Pullmann <jaroslav.pullmann@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Cc: Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKckEu5_NTx0jK03a3NXDWS-RU5Tu2OTLdLwZdt7fAiXK=BTcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Jaro,
I don't think you can say that DCAT Datasets are mainly raw data. There all
kinds of things modelled as DCAT Datasets. I recently heard about Apache
log files that are published as DCAT Datasets.
I keep saying that it's really difficult, maybe even impossible, to find
limits to what a DCAT Dataset is.
Also note that ADMS-AP 2.0 is really a DCAT Application Profile as it
models the Assets directly as DCAT Datasets where version 1.0 modelled them
as ADMS Assets.
Makx
Op 17 aug. 2017 11:39 p.m. schreef "Jaroslav Pullmann" <
jaroslav.pullmann@fit.fraunhofer.de>:
>
> Hallo Makx,
>
> thank you for the valuable pointer! Since we several times informally
> mentioned the importance of
> modeling software related to processing / production / delivery of data
> I hoped this topic was of a broader
> interest.
>
> Let me better understand what distinguishes DCAT Dataset from ADMS
> Asset and when the latter is applicable:
>
> "Therefore the difference in user expectation is at the heart of what
> distinguishes ADMS as a profile of DCAT".
>
> With a target domain of eGovernment in mind ADMS seems to target end
> users interested in immediate reading,
> intellectual consumption (or execution) of "assets" and not in their
> arbitrary processing. Applications used for this
> purpose are commonly known and self-evident (text editor, web browser
> etc.). DCAT Datasets (Assets's superclass)
> seem to be more a "raw data", less suitable for humans than for tools
> and algorithms, right?
>
> Best regards
> Jaroslav
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, August 17, 2017 18:27 CEST, "Makx Dekkers" <
> mail@makxdekkers.com> wrote:
>
> > Jaro,
> >
> > I think you refer to my comment in one of the calls about the use of a
> DCAT Application Profile for software.
> >
> > My comment was about the Application Profile of ADMS, which is a
> specialisation of DCAT, called ADMS-AP, that is used in the aggregation of
> information about interoperability assets (controlled vocabularies,
> metadata schemas) and software solutions by the federated repositories on
> the Joinup platform, https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/catalogue/repository.
> >
> > The specification can be found at https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/
> asset/adms/asset_release/adms-ap-joinup-version-20.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Makx.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jaroslav Pullmann [mailto:jaroslav.pullmann@fit.fraunhofer.de]
> > Sent: 16 August 2017 11:26
> > To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
> > Subject: Modeling relationship between data and data-oriented software
> >
> >
> > Dear WG members,
> >
> > as part of my research I am considering the relationship between
> data sets and data-oriented software
> > and how this might be modeled in a consistent and uniform way. Based
> on the UC descriptions (ID8: scope
> > of dataset, ID20: resources different from datasets, ID9: link to
> software used to produce data) and our
> > discussions there seem to be at least the following ways of looking
> at this relationship:
> >
> > - Software as asset: Software being described as the central,
> promoted asset (Dataset)
> > - Software as part of provenance (past): Software used to
> produce/process particular Dataset
> > - Software as service: (future): Software that might be used for
> particular processing of a Dataset
> >
> > Are you aware of related research, standards or usage examples (I
> assume it was Simon mentioning a company
> > using DCAT to describe software distributions)? Particularly
> interesting is the modeling of data processing
> > services, their semantics ("transform", "aggregate") and the relation
> to data (parameters) they operate upon.
> >
> > Many thanks
> > Jaro
> >
> > --
> > Jaroslav Pullmann
> > Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT
> User-Centered Ubiquitous Computing Schloss Birlinghoven | D-53757 Sankt
> Augustin | Germany
> > Phone: +49-2241-143620 | Fax: +49-2241-142146
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jaroslav Pullmann
> Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT
> User-Centered Ubiquitous Computing
> Schloss Birlinghoven | D-53757 Sankt Augustin | Germany
> Phone: +49-2241-143620 | Fax: +49-2241-142146
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 17 August 2017 21:54:51 UTC