- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:26:31 +0000
- To: Marcel Fröhlich <marcel.frohlich@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-dxwg-comments@w3.org
Again you point out something that I should have included from the beginning. I have now amended the scope to say: Government data, scientific research data, enterprise and cultural heritage data, whether shared openly or not, are all explicitly in scope. Thanks again Marcel Phil On 16/03/2017 09:34, Marcel Fröhlich wrote: > Hi Phil, > > another thought on the scope. > It explicitly mentions data from gov, cultural heritage and scientific > research. > More interestingly, it currently does NOT mention enterprise data? > Is there a reason to exclude non-public resources on the web? > For longterm adoption, I think it is crucial to serve this important large > segment, too. > For open web technology to prosper it should not shy away from data behind > the firewalls. > When looking at enterprise datasets you will find a different view on data > with additional processes, actors and metadata items that are relevant, > mostly around data governance within the firms. > > Regards, Marcel > > 2017-03-16 9:38 GMT+01:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>: > >> Correct, sorry Marcel, I should have included that. >> >> It's now listed as an input at https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/charter/#scope >> >> Thanks for prompting me. >> >> Phil >> >> On 15/03/2017 23:39, Marcel Fröhlich wrote: >> >>> Hi Phil, >>> >>> You are probably aware of the dataid vocabulary in the dbpedia project: >>> http://wiki.dbpedia.org/projects/dbpedia-dataid >>> Maybe another source to look at for the new WG. >>> >>> Regards, Marcel >>> >>> >> -- >> >> >> Phil Archer >> Data Strategist, W3C >> http://www.w3.org/ >> >> http://philarcher.org >> +44 (0)7887 767755 >> @philarcher1 >> > -- Phil Archer Data Strategist, W3C http://www.w3.org/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2017 11:27:12 UTC