W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-comments@w3.org > March 2017

Re: Related vocabulary

From: Marcel Fröhlich <marcel.frohlich@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:34:10 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHKA4LwhGpqoOSyy4q4ZmOpi6fbO=EPsBp9fH4Ejia3HNnKy3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Cc: public-dxwg-comments@w3.org
Hi Phil,

another thought on the scope.
It explicitly mentions data from gov, cultural heritage and scientific
research.
More interestingly, it currently does NOT mention enterprise data?
Is there a reason to exclude non-public resources on the web?
For longterm adoption, I think it is crucial to serve this important large
segment, too.
For open web technology to prosper it should not shy away from data behind
the firewalls.
When looking at enterprise datasets you will find a different view on data
with additional processes, actors and metadata items that are relevant,
mostly around data governance within the firms.

Regards, Marcel

2017-03-16 9:38 GMT+01:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>:

> Correct, sorry Marcel, I should have included that.
>
> It's now listed as an input at https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/charter/#scope
>
> Thanks for prompting me.
>
> Phil
>
> On 15/03/2017 23:39, Marcel Fröhlich wrote:
>
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>> You are probably aware of the dataid vocabulary in the dbpedia project:
>> http://wiki.dbpedia.org/projects/dbpedia-dataid
>> Maybe another source to look at for the new WG.
>>
>> Regards, Marcel
>>
>>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> Data Strategist, W3C
> http://www.w3.org/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2017 09:34:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 16 March 2017 09:34:44 UTC