- From: <Peter.Winstanley@gov.scot>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 12:29:31 +0000
- To: <phila@w3.org>, <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, <newton@nic.br>
I'm making some direct personal contacts with people re the evidence. Just flagging this up. I've also passed it to Jeanne Holm hoping that she'll pass it on to others in the LA area. If there are snappier ways of gathering the information please let me know ASAP so that I can update these contacts. Cheers Peter -----Original Message----- From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org] Sent: 13 October 2016 16:54 To: Public DWBP WG; Newton Calegari Subject: Experiences with the form Dear all, I know that Newton, Carol et al are all involved in the web.br conference that Dee and I enjoyed going to last year but I wanted to share some experiences with the evidence form. 1. It takes a *long* time to fill in. Also it asks for a URL for every BP when I'm trying to assess a specific dataset, so I keep on pasting the same URL in each time. 2. All I've done so far is to find an example dataset (by looking at datahub.io and choosing the first one listed today) and worked with that. I haven't been able to finish filling in the form yet but there are several where my ideal answer would be 'partially passed' rather than a straight pass/fail. I'm looking at https://datahub.io/dataset/loddw. The descriptive metadata is very poor, most of what is there is auto-generated by CKAN anyway. There certainly isn't the rich metadata we'd like to see. I'll try and get to the end but it will take a while. 3. But! What I did notice was that the metadata includes the name of the individual responsible. So I thought I'd look him up and ask *him* to fill in the form (Twitter is *so* useful). See https://twitter.com/philarcher1/status/786560420341436417 Targeting individuals like this might be an efficient way of encouraging them to fill in the form? And, @newton, sorry, but the form is out of date since it has the original locale BP still at no. 4. That really needs to be updated to match the doc for which we're gathering evidence of implementation. I don't think there'll be a call tomorrow but I can't join one of there is. Cheers Phil. -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1 ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________ *********************************** ******************************** This email has been received from an external party and has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. ******************************************************************** ********************************************************************** This e-mail (and any files or other attachments transmitted with it) is intended solely for the attention of the addressee(s). Unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, copying or distribution of any part of this e-mail is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient please destroy the email, remove any copies from your system and inform the sender immediately by return. Communications with the Scottish Government may be monitored or recorded in order to secure the effective operation of the system and for other lawful purposes. The views or opinions contained within this e-mail may not necessarily reflect those of the Scottish Government. Tha am post-d seo (agus faidhle neo ceanglan còmhla ris) dhan neach neo luchd-ainmichte a-mhàin. Chan eil e ceadaichte a chleachdadh ann an dòigh sam bith, a’ toirt a-steach còraichean, foillseachadh neo sgaoileadh, gun chead. Ma ’s e is gun d’fhuair sibh seo le gun fhiosd’, bu choir cur às dhan phost-d agus lethbhreac sam bith air an t-siostam agaibh, leig fios chun neach a sgaoil am post-d gun dàil. Dh’fhaodadh gum bi teachdaireachd sam bith bho Riaghaltas na h-Alba air a chlàradh neo air a sgrùdadh airson dearbhadh gu bheil an siostam ag obair gu h-èifeachdach neo airson adhbhar laghail eile. Dh’fhaodadh nach eil beachdan anns a’ phost-d seo co-ionann ri beachdan Riaghaltas na h-Alba. **********************************************************************
Received on Monday, 17 October 2016 12:29:59 UTC