- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:54:22 +0100
- To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Newton Calegari <newton@nic.br>
Dear all, I know that Newton, Carol et al are all involved in the web.br conference that Dee and I enjoyed going to last year but I wanted to share some experiences with the evidence form. 1. It takes a *long* time to fill in. Also it asks for a URL for every BP when I'm trying to assess a specific dataset, so I keep on pasting the same URL in each time. 2. All I've done so far is to find an example dataset (by looking at datahub.io and choosing the first one listed today) and worked with that. I haven't been able to finish filling in the form yet but there are several where my ideal answer would be 'partially passed' rather than a straight pass/fail. I'm looking at https://datahub.io/dataset/loddw. The descriptive metadata is very poor, most of what is there is auto-generated by CKAN anyway. There certainly isn't the rich metadata we'd like to see. I'll try and get to the end but it will take a while. 3. But! What I did notice was that the metadata includes the name of the individual responsible. So I thought I'd look him up and ask *him* to fill in the form (Twitter is *so* useful). See https://twitter.com/philarcher1/status/786560420341436417 Targeting individuals like this might be an efficient way of encouraging them to fill in the form? And, @newton, sorry, but the form is out of date since it has the original locale BP still at no. 4. That really needs to be updated to match the doc for which we're gathering evidence of implementation. I don't think there'll be a call tomorrow but I can't join one of there is. Cheers Phil. -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2016 15:54:33 UTC