- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 11:21:15 -0700
- To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <06590989-9107-8550-61bb-248e8e76016b@lbl.gov>
I like the wikipedia one better, too. The dublin core one is not describing a technical standard. -Annette On 5/20/16 6:51 AM, yaso wrote: > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: Action-148 > Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:51:43 +0000 > Resent-From: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:51:07 +0100 > From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> > To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > > > > Hi, > > Re-iterating an earlier recommendation, I do like the first paragraph of Wikipedia's article on technical standards: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_standard > This could fit well in our context. > But if people prefer the DC one I can of course perfectly live with it. > > Cheers, > > Antoine > > On 3/14/16 5:31 PM, yaso wrote: > > regarding the action-148 > >https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/148 > > > > my proposal is to adopt this definition for "Standard" > >http://dublincore.org/documents/2012/06/14/dcmi-terms/?v=terms#Standard > > > > cheers, > > > > > > > > > -- Annette Greiner NERSC Data and Analytics Services Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Received on Friday, 20 May 2016 18:21:49 UTC