- From: yaso <yaso@nic.br>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 10:51:11 -0300
- To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 20 May 2016 13:51:51 UTC
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: Action-148 Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:51:43 +0000 Resent-From: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:51:07 +0100 From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org Hi, Re-iterating an earlier recommendation, I do like the first paragraph of Wikipedia's article on technical standards: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_standard This could fit well in our context. But if people prefer the DC one I can of course perfectly live with it. Cheers, Antoine On 3/14/16 5:31 PM, yaso wrote: > regarding the action-148 > https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/148 > > my proposal is to adopt this definition for "Standard" > http://dublincore.org/documents/2012/06/14/dcmi-terms/?v=terms#Standard > > cheers, > > >
Received on Friday, 20 May 2016 13:51:51 UTC