Re: Fwd: Re: Action-148

Right,  I'll add the wikipedia term, then.


Tks!



On 05/20/2016 03:21 PM, Annette Greiner wrote:
>
> I like the wikipedia one better, too. The dublin core one is not 
> describing a technical standard.
>
> -Annette
>
>
> On 5/20/16 6:51 AM, yaso wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject:  Re: Action-148
>> Resent-Date:  Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:51:43 +0000
>> Resent-From:  public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
>> Date:  Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:51:07 +0100
>> From:  Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
>> To:  public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Re-iterating an earlier recommendation, I do like the first paragraph of Wikipedia's article on technical standards:
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_standard
>> This could fit well in our context.
>> But if people prefer the DC one I can of course perfectly live with it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>> On 3/14/16 5:31 PM, yaso wrote:
>> > regarding the action-148
>> >https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/148
>> >
>> > my proposal is to adopt this definition for "Standard"
>> >http://dublincore.org/documents/2012/06/14/dcmi-terms/?v=terms#Standard
>> >
>> > cheers,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Annette Greiner
> NERSC Data and Analytics Services
> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
>

-- 
-yaso


Centro de Tecnologias Web
W3C Escritório Brasil
NIC.br - CGI.br
Skype: yasocordova
Phone: 55 11 5509-3537 (4025)