Hi, Gregg!
We discussed the proposal with the group and, although we think it's a
good idea and there is a real demand for BPs on JSON-LD APIs, as the
demands for its use is growing, we have some concerns about the time
because the DWBP WG has less than two months to end and the group is
focused on get to the CR and then Rec. Considering it, the group agreed
that wouldn't be possible to publish the doc due to the lifetime of DWBP WG.
The group also raised the alternative of submitting the doc as member
submission, but we think it's worth to cope with this in a new group.
I'm including this to the DWBP Whish List [1].
I really like the idea of BPs for JSON-LD, so I would love to work with
you in a possible new IG or CG (or a WG, why not?) focused on it. Could
we start a group to work on JSON-LD BPs?
Best,
Newton
[1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Main_Page#Wish_List
Em 02/06/16 14:30, Hadley Beeman escreveu:
> Thanks Gregg! I'm adding in the other DWBP editors and chairs to this
> thread...
>
> -H
>
> Le jeudi 2 juin 2016, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> a écrit :
>
> Hi, at the suggestion of Manu, Dave and Shane, I started a
> document on Building JSON-LD APIs: Best Practices [1][2]. There is
> quite about of doubt in the general industry on how to create
> reusable APIs, and there is misinformation about the use of
> JSON-LD as well. This document is an attempt to codify best
> practices for APIs using JSON, with a light-handed approach to
> using JSON-LD and as-little-as-possible mention of Linked Data and
> RDF. Given that it relates to data on the web, I thought it might
> have a home as a Note of the DWBP WG, depending on the group’s
> timeline (and, of course, that I’m not actually a member of the
> WG). The alternate home is likely the JSON-LD Community Group,
> which we’d most likely use otherwise, but I thought it good to
> bring this to your attention.
>
> There’s obviously much more work to do on the document, and it
> might be good to keep it “living” with new best practices added as
> the need arises, which might not be consistent with being a WG
> Note, but might as an IG or CG Note.
>
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net <javascript:;>
>
> [1]
> https://rawgit.com/gkellogg/36b51a2681e1d6a0a9146041fd6564d5/raw/0b4af28c82074c3936e62645e2f011ed301247e0/json-ld-api-best-practices.html
> [2] https://gist.github.com/gkellogg/36b51a2681e1d6a0a9146041fd6564d5
>