- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 18:22:23 +0100
- To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
As ever, the minutes of today's meeting are at
https://www.w3.org/2016/07/22-dwbp-minutes and copied below as text.
We talked about the reviews from the I18N community and the time line
from now on. A *possible* time line is:
* Editors work through I18N comments and the one from Rob Sanderson.
Issues look resolvable but any questions will be raised on the list
and/or in next week's call.
* The hope is that we can re-resolve to seek transition to Candidate Rec
no later than Friday 5 August.
* A possible date and time for the Director call is immediately after
that WG call on 5 August.
Meanwhile... I take my leave of you for 3 weeks. I will be offline from
no later than Monday afternoon. Back on Tuesday 16th.
Therefore, if I am to prepare the doc for publication - I hope with both
the vocabs as well as the BP doc - the publication date will be Thursday
18th August.
Cheers
Phil.
Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference
22 Jul 2016
[2]Agenda
[2] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160722
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2016/07/22-dwbp-irc
Attendees
Present
deirdrelee, hadleybeeman, phila, RiccardoAlbertoni,
yaso, laufer, Caroline_
Regrets
Annette, Newton, Antoine, EricS, Bernadette
Chair
deirdrelee
Scribe
hadleybeeman
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Comments from I18N
2. [6]last week's minutes
3. [7]I18N comments
* [8]Summary of Action Items
* [9]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<RiccardoAlbertoni> hi all!
<yaso> Hi! I'm in a place with lots of background noise so I
muted myself
Comments from I18N
<phila> deirdrelee: Will we need another vote after the
changes?
<RiccardoAlbertoni> hi all
<phila> phila: It feels as if we should wait until the
commnetsd have been addressed and then vote for CR again
<scribe> scribenick: hadleybeeman
<deirdrelee> Agenda:
[10]https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160722
[10] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160722
<deirdrelee> PROPOSED: Accept minutes from last week's meeting
[11]https://www.w3.org/2016/07/15-dwbp-minutes.html
[11] https://www.w3.org/2016/07/15-dwbp-minutes.html
last week's minutes
<deirdrelee> +1
<yaso> +1
<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1
<phila> +1
+1
<Caroline_> Hello! :)
<deirdrelee> APPROVED: Accept minutes from last week's meeting
[12]https://www.w3.org/2016/07/15-dwbp-minutes.html
[12] https://www.w3.org/2016/07/15-dwbp-minutes.html
deirdrelee: Any BP editors on the call?
<Caroline_> yes! :)
deirdrelee: don't seem to; only on IRC
... Okay, so I presume no one has had a chance to look at the
I18N comments?
... They have come in in the last hour.
... Good that they've arrived when expected.
... Next step: from the editors, tell us when we can look at
them, review them and address them.
... Ideally ASAP, but need to be realistic.
... We
... We'd planned to have the transition call on Monday coming,
but don't think we'll be able to.
<Makx> I just had a look at I18N comments
<Makx> Most editorial
deirdrelee: Instead, I think we'll need this week to look at
them, address the comments, vote again on the version of the BP
doc that includes the update, and then have the director's
call.
Caroline_: Thanks, deirdrelee.
... Newton and Bernadette send their regrets for today's call.
... Would the chairs and Phil help us with this review? To have
another point of view?
... How long do we have to do it? I know as soon as possible,
and we will try to do it by next week, but with the summer
vacation in Europe... Will we be able to have the directors'
call the following week?
<Makx> Not sure I agree with criticism that Library of Congress
URI have 'limitations or problems'
Caroline_: We can't do the 3rd week of August.
deirdrelee: we'll create a doodle poll and find a time that
suits everyone, for the director's call
... Re the comments, most are editorial/very minor. Maybe
instead of having lots of people look, if the editors could
look first and pull out the more difficult/complex issues -- we
can discuss them by email?
Caroline_: Awesome. Thank you.
<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1 to deirdrelee's proposal
<yaso> +1 to Deirdre also
phila: Yes, I think the comments are mostly editorial. But when
you look in detail, you may find some more complex.
... I'm not able to help for the next three weeks.
... I think it will take at least a week to go through the
comments.
... By this time next week, you may have issues you want to
raise.
... At the moment, we're trying to get TimBL. His availability
is limited.
... By the time the group has worked through those comments, it
will probably be a week. Best case scenario, you vote on two
weeks from today.
... No minimum number for that vote.
... But not looking at candidate rec until three weeks' time.
... So even if we have to wait for the directors' call, that's
probably okay.
... You don't need me for the director's call. deirdrelee, if
you can set one up that would be great.
... It's about the chairs and the editors.
deirdrelee: I think it's important before we have that call
that we do address those issues and have another vote.
... Re extension for the wg, do we have to do anything else?
phila: No; I expect to put that request in after the transition
call.
deirdrelee: even though that's outside of our charter?
phila: I think that will be okay.
deirdrelee: Any other comments?
hadleybeeman: Sounds good to me
<Caroline_> :)
deirdrelee: Re rest of our time... Start looking into I18N
comments? Or talk about implementations?
... Though might be difficult without Bernadette and Newton
Caroline_: We could start with the I18N comments, but if you
don't mind, discussing implementations first would be easier.
deirdrelee: Okay
... Re implementations, we just wanted feedback on progress.
Any issues or problems?
<RiccardoAlbertoni> \me bye Makx
<Caroline_>
[13]https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Dwbp-LC-implementationrep
ort
[13] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Dwbp-LC-implementationreport
Caroline_: I have to apologise; until yesterday I couldn't send
an email about it. So I did my action, I wrote an email with
the links for the implementation report
<Caroline_>
[14]https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Dwbp-LC-implementationrep
ort.PT
[14] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Dwbp-LC-implementationreport.PT
Caroline_: Like deirdrelee did for the call for review.
<Caroline_>
[15]https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n6tOphCLXLrzHrdyRUH
Vgrgx1YARdauBQBy9jSJXgDQ/edit#gid=0
[15]
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n6tOphCLXLrzHrdyRUHVgrgx1YARdauBQBy9jSJXgDQ/edit#gid=0
Caroline_: I did it in English and in Portuguese.
... Comments welcome
... Instead of building a table in the wiki, I kept the google
docs we did in Zagreb.
... I sent the email to nic.br here.
... We will get evidence from them.
... Today, I will send it to a lot of the people in the google
docs spreadsheet.
... You're welcome to join me in doing that.
... I put the deadline in for a week from now. Not sure if its
too sure? Here where it isn't summer, it's fine. We don't
really stop in July.
... So I think we might have good implementations. I'm sure
laufer will help with focus datasets.
deirdrelee: The list of institutions... is that based on
feedback already? Or just organisations that have expressed
interest.
Caroline_: Only organisations that have expressed interest. But
I haven't updated it.
... If you could help me with the contacts you have, that would
be appreciated.
phila: Fantastic, thank you Caroline_. Just wanted to share: we
said that guidance does;t count as implementations, which is
probably right -- but I wanted to share what's happening at
SharePSI.
<phila> -> www.w3.org/2013/share-psi/lg/ Share-PSI Localised
Guides
phila: that page needs work on presentation, but the info on it
is still useful.
... there is a long list there of localised guides. Produced by
the relevant government ministry, saying 'this is how we do
open data in this administration'.
... In each case, there is a list of the best practices, with a
link to where it is in those guides, that says "you should do
this". Sometimes it's a specific reference to our BP; sometimes
it's just the same idea.
... At the bottom is a table
<Caroline_> looks great, Phil!
phila: Showing all this.
... The one with the fewest implementations has 6. Highest has
23.
... That's a definite endorsement of our work.
... This isn't what we're looking for; I don't want to change
what the BP editors have been working on.
<phila> [16]Share-PSI DWBP cross ref
[16]
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1v54h3Hc3bc3WEOnVX5fR_Sk-zrAk62KYrsa-ULndQUc/edit#gid=0
phila: But I've also asked this people to fill in a google
spreadsheet which tries to do something similar with our stuff.
... You'll see where our BP is cited directly, or the info in
their guideline is consistent with what we're saying.
<Caroline_> very nice!!!
phila: I know it doesn't count as an implementation, but I
think this is useful evidence to back up what we're saying.
deirdrelee: That's really good.
phila: that page has had me writing a 1400-line JSON file by
hand
<yaso> Yes it is :-)
phila: That page has had me writing a 1400-line JSON file by
hand
... There is just no consistency. You end up doing it all by
hand.
deirdrelee: We could use this research to add to the list of
people we are going to contact, to ask for implementations.
... To write to? I'd bet they have some good ones.
<Caroline_> +1 to deirdrelee suggestion
hadleybeeman: Good thought
<RiccardoAlbertoni> A question: when is the latest deadline for
submitting implementations?
<phila> [17]My JSOn file
[17] https://www.w3.org/2013/share-psi/bp/implementations.json
deirdrelee: any other feedback? Caroline_, what do you want us
to do?
Caroline_: Re deadline: the email template says Friday 29 July.
<deirdrelee>
[18]https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n6tOphCLXLrzHrdyRUH
Vgrgx1YARdauBQBy9jSJXgDQ/edit#gid=0
[18]
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n6tOphCLXLrzHrdyRUHVgrgx1YARdauBQBy9jSJXgDQ/edit#gid=0
Caroline_: to have as many evidence forms as possible completed
and returned to us.
<Caroline_> Evidence Form [19]http://w3c.br/form-dwbp/
[19] http://w3c.br/form-dwbp/
Caroline_: So we send emails ASAP, and have as many forms
completed as we can by 29 July.
... I'm not sure if you can send this email until Monday, but I
can do it at least. I can then follow up after. It's my
priority.
deirdrelee: Given the reshuffling of things that are going on,
transitioning the BP document etc., I think maybe aiming for
the 29th of July is soon.
... And I'm not sure we need to do that. the group is
continuing on, and it's holiday time, and this week our
priority is the I18N comments.
<RiccardoAlbertoni> I completely agree with deirdrelee ;)
deirdrelee: We should definitely start this week -- but we do
want to give people enough time to respond.
<Caroline_> ok
deirdrelee: I think we could put the deadline at the end of
August.
<Caroline_> what date do you suggest? I think it is important
to send a deadline in the email
phila: There is no rush. the thing that makes this group
unusual is the strong presence of southern hemisphere
participation.
... Europe and America are in shutdown between now and end of
august.
... So I agree, we need to concentrate on the I18N comments.
... So for implementations, it probably will be the end of
August. And that's okay.
<Caroline_> okay! Thank you!!
phila: So there's no rush to get those implementation reports.
Once we're in CR, we'll have at least 4 weeks to complete this.
... The pressure is to get to where we are. We've done that.
... If we were still rewriting, and needed a new working draft
next week, we'd be in trouble. but we're not.
deirdrelee: Okay. based on that, let's focus the I18N comments
this week and scheduling the director's call.
... We can keep going with implementations and Caroline_, you
can remind us all to keep at it. but we can do that over the
next month or two.
Caroline_: thank you very much. should we put a deadline on the
email?
hadleybeeman: Yes please
Caroline_: Which deadline then? I put 29 July, so we are
changing it to...?
hadleybeeman: If we need to be in CR for a minimum of four
weeks... and if we start that in three weeks (the week
beginning the 15th)
phila: so if those CR docs go out on thursday 18 August, then
the earliest that CR would end is Friday 16 September.
... so if Caroline_ is asking for a deadline, I would say the
end of August is difficult for Europe.
... I think you need to go into September. So Thursday 15 sept
is realistic.
... so on our call on Friday the 16th, we could see if we had
enough info.
deirdrelee: I think we're talking about two different
deadlines. 1) When do we the working group send out emails to
invite implementation feedback? 2) when do we need feedback
back?
... On the 1), I think 5 August would be good. And then for 2),
15 september.
phila: Thank you.
Caroline_: thank you
... One more thing: I'm just dreaming here, but maybe what
would happen if we got two implementations for each BP from
Brazil?
phila: that's okay
hadleybeeman: I would imagine the director would ask about it,
but officially it's within the rules.
deirdrelee: Having two implementations is a minimum. We want to
prove that these are adopted widely.
<phila> [20]Confirms 4 week minimum for CR
[20] https://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/#candidate-rec
deirdrelee: So having more examples of some is great. We can
record all of that.
I18N comments
deirdrelee: Caroline_, it might be useful to thank them and
tell them we're working on it today.
Caroline_: sure; I'll do that.
<scribe> ACTION: caroline to write to I18N chairs to confirm we
got their comments and will respond next week. [recorded in
[21]http://www.w3.org/2016/07/22-dwbp-minutes.html#action01]
[21] http://www.w3.org/2016/07/22-dwbp-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-290 - Write to i18n chairs to confirm
we got their comments and will respond next week. [on Caroline
Burle - due 2016-07-29].
phila: I think we can close Newton's action 288
<deirdrelee> action-268
<trackbot> action-268 -- Antoine Isaac to Add intro to daq in
the dqv -- due 2016-03-22 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [22]http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/268
[22] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/268
phila: and the other one to look at: action 268
... RiccardoAlbertoni, any comments?
RiccardoAlbertoni: I'm not sure if Antoine has taken it. I
should check.
phila: Okay
... Other action (287) is on me to set up the director's call,
which I can't do yet;
deirdrelee: Let's go back to I18N issues
... Any that jump out at us? Anyone had a chance to consider
one in any detail?
... Caroline_, any big concerns here?
Caroline_: I haven't seen the emails yet. sorry.
... I thought I could have some input from all of you today
deirdrelee: There really wasn't time before the call, was
there.
... Okay. If there is no other business, let's end the call
early?
RiccardoAlbertoni: I checked with Antoine; he finished action
268, so we can close it.
close action-268
<trackbot> Closed action-268.
RiccardoAlbertoni: There is an email from Jeremy saying it is
fine for him, how we solved this.
deirdrelee: and we close action 288 as well?
<deirdrelee> action-288
<trackbot> action-288 -- Newton Calegari to Launch the
implementation form on july 4th -- due 2016-07-08 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [23]http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/288
[23] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/288
close action-288
<trackbot> Closed action-288.
<RiccardoAlbertoni> great!
deirdrelee: thanks, all! Let's close the meeting;
<RiccardoAlbertoni> thanks all!
deirdrelee: I'll continue sorting the director's call. Aiming
for two weeks from now.
<Caroline_> thank you so much!!!
phila: I should know when philippe le hagret is back -- when
that happens, he'll do it rather than TimBL.
... I'll find out in a minute. My guess is it will be then.
It's all done in tim's name, but he's very busy.
Caroline_: call next week?
hadleybeeman: Yes, I think so
deirdrelee: We can have one just to check in
Caroline_: Thanks!
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: caroline to write to I18N chairs to confirm we
got their comments and will respond next week. [recorded in
[24]http://www.w3.org/2016/07/22-dwbp-minutes.html#action01]
[24] http://www.w3.org/2016/07/22-dwbp-minutes.html#action01
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 22 July 2016 17:20:53 UTC