Re: Versioning

Hi Makx,

Thanks a lot for your feedback!

> ·         IN BP7, I would exclude the translation case; this is a bit
> different because the data (the observations) do not change, so it’s not
> covered by your definition “A and B store values for the same observation
> about the world and dataset B gives new values to such observation”. For
> example, DCAT recommends language versions to be modelled as Distributions
> of the same Dataset.
>
yes, it makes sense. Translation is not a case of versioning. But, I think
I need to change just the introduction of the section. I don't see this in
BP7 :)

>
>
> ·         In BP8, you might include an approach based on timestamping in
> the Possible Approach to Implementation; this is what a lot of people are
> already doing.
>

ok! It sounds good for me!

>
>
Cheers,
Berna


>
>
> Makx.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Bernadette Farias Lóscio [mailto:bfl@cin.ufpe.br]
> *Sent:* 16 September 2015 02:00
> *To:* Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
> *Cc:* Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Versioning
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I started the rewriting of the versioning section [1] according to some of
> the ideas discussed in this thread and it will be great to have your
> feedback. Please feel free to make modifications or suggestions.
>
>
>
> Until now, I just considered data updates. If possible, I'd like to have
> your opinion if schema updates should also be considered a case of
> versioning, i.e, when  the schema of a dataset changes, should be created a
> new dataset or just a new version of the existing dataset?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Bernadette
>
>
>
> [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#dataVersioning
>
>
>
>
>
> 2015-08-04 15:17 GMT-03:00 Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>:
>
> Laufer,
>
> Thanks for your thoughts.
>
> > I think we are trying here to define the DWBP WG meaning for the term
> version, that is
> > related to BPs "Provide versioning (version?) information" and "Provide
> version history".
>
> Yes, this was my intention.
>
> > Maybe we would need a new (more general) BP that talks about what
> metadata would
> > be important for datasets that have some type of relations that we are
> not considering a
> > "version" relation.
> > (Types of relations that are considered sometimes as a version relation
> by other groups).
>
> In fact, the DCAT-AP group was hoping that the DWBP WG could provide
> guidance on this.
>
> Makx.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------