Re: [odcgeneralstewardslist] IODC+ DATA ROADMAPS: Gov of Mex on Bundled Commitment on IODC & National Consultation/Roadmap on the Data Revolution for Sustainable Development

Great.  We are happy to share our Vocabulary draft with Junar and hope that
NuCivic, Socrata, and CKAN will also participate.  Furthermore, we hope
that members of the Open Data Charter Stewardship Group will also provide
input.

Thanks Diego!


Best Regards,

Steve

Motto: "Do First, Think, Do it Again"


|------------>
| From:      |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Diego May <diego.may@junar.com>                                                                                                                   |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To:        |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Steven Adler/Somers/IBM@IBMUS, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>                                                                         |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Cc:        |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Andrew Hoppin <andrew@nucivic.com>, Barbara Ubaldi <Barbara.UBALDI@oecd.org>, Carlos Iglesias                         |
  |<carlos.iglesias@webfoundation.org>, Daniel Dietrich <daniel.dietrich@okfn.org>, "Jose M. Alonso" <josema@webfoundation.org>, Kevin Merritt       |
  |<kevin.merritt@socrata.com>, Marcio Vasconcelos <Marcio.Vasconcelos@avina.net>, "ODCstewardslist@opendatacharter.net"                             |
  |<odcstewardslist@opendatacharter.net>, DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, sumandro <sumandro@cis-india.org>, Tim Davies                    |
  |<tim@practicalparticipation.co.uk>, "Zeitz, Paul S" <ZeitzPS@state.gov>                                                                           |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date:      |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |09/15/2015 11:29 AM                                                                                                                               |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject:   |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Re: [odcgeneralstewardslist] IODC+ DATA ROADMAPS: Gov of Mex on Bundled Commitment on IODC & National Consultation/Roadmap on the Data Revolution |
  |for Sustainable Development                                                                                                                       |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|





Hi all,

I do agree in the importance of talking about OD utilization, statistics,
metadata and more. Just let me know if there is any call or any specific
question we can work on to help.

Have a great day,

Diego

Diego May
Co-founder & CEO
  Junar, Open Data Made Simple
  Twitter @Junar @diegomay :: Blog Blog.junar.com :: Linkedin Diegohmay
   Post acerca de Datos Abiertos :: ¿Cambiará la democracia en próximos
años?

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
wrote:
  Hi Steve,

  Thanks a lot for helping us to share and promote our activities on the
  Dataset Usage Vocab. We are working on a new version of the vocab and as
  soon as a more stable version is available, we're gonna share
  this with the group.

  We aim to produce a vocab that's gonna be really  helpful and for this It
  is important to gather feedback from the community!

  cheers,
  Bernadette




  2015-09-14 12:06 GMT-03:00 Steven Adler <adler1@us.ibm.com>:
   Phil,

   Great points.  I hope those on copy will work with us (W3C) to make sure
   our Vocabulary standards have immediate real world impact.


   Best Regards,

   Steve

   Motto: "Do First, Think, Do it Again"

   Inactive hide details for Phil Archer ---09/12/2015 02:40:29 AM---The
   motivation behind developing the Dataset Usage Vocab is tPhil Archer
   ---09/12/2015 02:40:29 AM---The motivation behind developing the Dataset
   Usage Vocab is to avoid  publishers putting their data



                                                                           
                                                                           
       From:         Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>                            
                                                                           
                                                                           
       To:           Steven Adler/Somers/IBM@IBMUS, "Jose M. Alonso" <     
                     josema@webfoundation.org>, DWBP Public List <         
                     public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>                                
                                                                           
                                                                           
       Cc:           Barbara Ubaldi <Barbara.UBALDI@oecd.org>, Carlos      
                     Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@webfoundation.org>, Daniel  
                     Dietrich <daniel.dietrich@okfn.org>, Marcio           
                     Vasconcelos <Marcio.Vasconcelos@avina.net>, "         
                     ODCstewardslist@opendatacharter.net" <                
                     odcstewardslist@opendatacharter.net>, sumandro <      
                     sumandro@cis-india.org>, Tim Davies <                 
                     tim@practicalparticipation.co.uk>, "Zeitz, Paul S" <  
                     ZeitzPS@state.gov>, Andrew Hoppin <andrew@nucivic.com 
                     >, Kevin Merritt <kevin.merritt@socrata.com>, Diego   
                     May Junar <diego.may@junar.com>                       
                                                                           
                                                                           
       Date:         09/12/2015 02:40 AM                                   
                                                                           
                                                                           
       Subject:      Re: [odcgeneralstewardslist] IODC+ DATA ROADMAPS: Gov 
                     of Mex on  Bundled Commitment on IODC & National      
                     Consultation/Roadmap on the Data  Revolution for      
                     Sustainable Development                               
                                                                           






   The motivation behind developing the Dataset Usage Vocab is to avoid
   publishers putting their data behind a registration step. I was talking
   to someone this week about the EU's Copernicus data - a huge trove of
   satellite imagery that the EC trumpets as a great example of open data.
   She was a little non-plussed when I said that, since you have to login
   and fill in a form that tells them what you plan to do with the data, it

   can't be called open.

   So the idea is to create not only a vocab but an incentive for data
   re-users to publish info about what they've used and what they've sued
   it for. I see two incentives:

   - discovery (think schema.org);
   - encouraging the publisher to keep on publishing.

   Being able to 'ask the Web' who's using my data and what is it being
   used for would be good.

   This has some resonance with the research world's activities like
   DataCite, CrossRef etc.

   Phil.


   On 09/09/2015 12:58, Steven Adler wrote:
   >
   > Jose,
   >
   > I don't think we need to organize more sessions at conferences to
   figure
   > out how to measure OD utilization.  Might be easier to just talk to
   > Socrata, Junar, NuCivic, and CKAN folks to organize common utilization
   > metrics.
   >
   > I am adding my W3C Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group
   colleagues
   > to this discussion since standardizing that metadata is within our
   mandate
   > and we are working on Data Quality and Usability Vocabularies.
   >
   > Also adding Kevin Merrit (Socrata), Diego May (Junar), and Andrew
   Hoppin
   > (NuCivic).  I guess there are people already on copy who can represent
   > CKAN.
   >
   > Kevin, Diego, Andrew - We are having a conversation about how to
   measure
   > aggregate Open Data utilization and we wonder if it would be possible
   to
   > agree on common metadata standards that would allow API calls to your
   OD
   > catalogs.  We would like to be able to add OD utilization and quality
   > statistics to common OD Supply Indexes.
   >
   > Sorry to dump you all into this long thread.  But it seems to me that
   right
   > now, while our industry is relatively small, we have the opportunity
   to
   > agree on common standards that could really benefit many interests.
   >
   > Could we ask you for your views on this topic?
   >
   > Best Regards,
   >
   > Steve
   >
   > Motto: "Do First, Think, Do it Again"
   >
   >
   > |------------>
   > | From:      |
   > |------------>
   >
   >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   >    |"Jose M. Alonso" <josema@webfoundation.org>
   |
   >
   >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   > |------------>
   > | To:        |
   > |------------>
   >
   >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   >    |Tim Davies <tim@practicalparticipation.co.uk>
   |
   >
   >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   > |------------>
   > | Cc:        |
   > |------------>
   >
   >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   >    |Steven Adler/Somers/IBM@IBMUS, Daniel Dietrich <
   daniel.dietrich@okfn.org>, Barbara Ubaldi <Barbara.UBALDI@oecd.org>,
   Marcio Vasconcelos           |
   >    |<Marcio.Vasconcelos@avina.net>, "
   ODCstewardslist@opendatacharter.net" <
   odcstewardslist@opendatacharter.net>, sumandro <sumandro@cis-india.org>,
   |
   >    |"Zeitz, Paul S" <ZeitzPS@state.gov>, Carlos Iglesias <
   carlos.iglesias@webfoundation.org>
   |
   >
   >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   > |------------>
   > | Date:      |
   > |------------>
   >
   >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   >    |09/09/2015 06:41 AM
   |
   >
   >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   > |------------>
   > | Subject:   |
   > |------------>
   >
   >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   >    |Re: [odcgeneralstewardslist] IODC+ DATA ROADMAPS: Gov of Mex on
   Bundled Commitment on IODC & National Consultation/Roadmap on the Data
   Revolution |
   >    |for Sustainable Development
   |
   >
   >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   > Hi all,
   >
   > I fully agree this is a very important debate and, as Tim mentioned
   and (as
   > most of you know) he's been deeply involved with both the CAF and the
   ODB,
   > we keep on exploring at WF. The paper he referred to was commissioned
   to
   > keeping on exploring the "Use" element.
   >
   > I was also intrigued about the use of household surveys and met with
   the
   > World Justice Project team earlier this year to learn more about their
   > method. They work with local/regional companies and survey thousands
   of
   > people. Besides what Tim mentioned above, two more issues come to
   mind:
   > time requirements and cost. Pew's and WPJ's product are not cheap and
   WPJ's
   > needs 2 years per round. Complexity of the ODB itself has increased
   > already. For example, we have introduced this year government
   > self-assessments as a new data collection component.
   >
   > I believe we all certainly need to improve how we measure "Use" but
   also
   > keeping in mind the perfect might be the enemy of the good.
   >
   > I'm copying my colleague Carlos as he's currently managing the ODB and
   our
   > work on the CAF and may have something else to add.
   >
   > IIRC, we have organized sessions at the last several conferences on
   this
   > topic and we might want to do so again soon, maybe in the context of
   the
   > OGP ODWG meeting at the OGP Summit or on the sides of it as I believe
   most
   > of us will be there.
   >
   > Best,
   > Josema.
   >
   >
   >
   > 2015-09-09 10:12 GMT+02:00 Tim Davies <
   tim@practicalparticipation.co.uk>:
   >    This is a really important debate: and if finding good methods for
   >    assessing levels of open data use would be very valuable.
   >
   >
   >    Across the components of the Common Assessment Method for Open Data
   usage
   >    is the least surveyed - in part due to the complexity of finding
   good
   >    robust sampling strategies.
   >
   >    Surveys: Reflecting on Steve's suggestions around surveys:
   >
   >    The best examples we probably have of large scale survey work in
   this
   >    area is either from the Pew Internet Project, which has a
   single-country
   >    US survey capturing American's awareness of Open Government
   Initiatives (
   >    http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/21/open-government-data/), and
   then
   >    the World Justice Project's multi-country survey of major cities,
   which
   >    included a number of questions for their Open Government Index (
   >    http://data.worldjusticeproject.org/opengov/) relating to citizen
   >    perceptions around their use of Right to Information mechanisms.
   >
   >    However, particularly when it comes to getting cross-country
   comparison
   >    data that is sensitive specifically to open data, as opposed to the
   >    presence of an app economy or civic technology in general, it can
   be very
   >    difficult to frame definitions in surveys in ways that produce
   reliable
   >    and comparable data.
   >
   >    One of the issues faced in the Open Data Barometer's 'Impact'
   method,
   >    which broadly combines a measure of use and impact (asking about
   the
   >    presence of stories of open data having an impact in particular
   >    settings), is that countries that spend more resource capturing
   case
   >    studies of use may score higher than countries who have more cases
   of
   >    use, but where those cases are less well documented or promoted.
   Re-use
   >    that doesn't result in high-profile apps and websites is
   particularly
   >    likely to be missed by both expert and public-perception surveys.
   >
   >    From a robust evidence point of view, it's would also be important
   I
   >    think to have independent sampling and data collection: making it
   tricky
   >    to put govts in the middle of asking citizens to fill out surveys.
   >
   >    Other approaches: Two other approaches which might be useful here:
   >
   >    (1) Refining 'data availability' metrics. As Daniel notes, most of
   our
   >    measures of data openness right now are not sensitive enough to
   data
   >    quality.
   >
   >    There is some interesting work on domain-specific measures of
   quality
   >    (e.g. Open Data Watch Inventory - capturing levels of
   disaggregation in
   >    nationals stats:
   >    http://www.opendatawatch.com/Pages/Open-Data-Inventory.aspx), and
   finding
   >    metrics that indicate how re-usable a dataset is likely to be (
   >
   http://www.opendataresearch.org/dl/symposium2015/odrs2015-paper60.pdf).
   >
   >    I've been interested in exploring whether we can find efficient
   methods
   >    for use-case driven testing of the practical openness of datasets
   to
   >    replace/complement the current check-list approaches used in the
   Open
   >    Data Barometer and Index.
   >
   >    (2) Finding and evidencing good proxy variables.
   >
   >    The Open Data Barometer includes variables on civil society
   capacity, and
   >    private sector ICT capacity, in part because it hypothesises that
   these
   >    are important ingredients of enabling re-use.
   >
   >    It would be worth testing this in a number of contexts, and
   exploring
   >    whether there are other better proxy variables to capture factors
   aside
   >    from data quality which are strongly associated with the presence
   of open
   >    data re-use in a country.
   >
   >    ---
   >
   >
   >    All the best
   >
   >    Tim
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >    On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Steven Adler <adler1@us.ibm.com>
   wrote:
   >     Great.  The normal way to measure utilization is through consumer
   >     preference, but that requires a menu of different consumer choices
   with
   >     price discovery.  We have a free commodity with few market
   alternatives,
   >     therefore our only option is to survey consumer opinions of open
   data
   >     quality, relevance, and value.
   >
   >     Not very sophisticated but it works if we can develop a short
   survey and
   >     get governments to ask users to fill it out anonymously to
   generate
   >     reasonable sample sizes.
   >
   >     What do people think about this?
   >
   >     Best Regards,
   >
   >
   >     Steve Adler
   >     IBM
   >
   >
   >     Daniel Dietrich --- Re: [odcgeneralstewardslist] IODC+ DATA
   ROADMAPS:
   >     Gov of Mex on Bundled Commitment on IODC & National
   Consultation/Roadmap
   >     on the Data Revolution for Sustainable Development ---
   >
   >   From:  "Daniel Dietrich" <daniel.dietrich@okfn.org>
   >
   >   To:    "Steven Adler" <adler1@us.ibm.com>
   >
   >   Cc:    "Barbara Ubaldi" <Barbara.UBALDI@oecd.org>, "Jose Manuel
   Alonso" <
   >          josema@webfoundation.org>, "Marcio Vasconcelos" <
   >          Marcio.Vasconcelos@avina.net>, "
   >          ODCstewardslist@opendatacharter.net" <
   >          odcstewardslist@opendatacharter.net>, "sumandro" <
   >          sumandro@cis-india.org>, "" <ZeitzPS@state.gov>
   >
   >   Date:  Tue, Sep 8, 2015 6:08 PM
   >
   >   Subjec Re: [odcgeneralstewardslist] IODC+ DATA ROADMAPS: Gov of Mex
   on
   >   t:     Bundled Commitment on IODC & National Consultation/Roadmap on
   the
   >          Data Revolution for Sustainable Development
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >     This is a great point! At Open Knowledge we have thought about
   (but not
   >     yet found an answer) on how to add the user perspective to the
   Open Data
   >     Index, as we have found that some countries actually score
   relatively
   >     high in the OD index and OD barometer, but when you go and ask
   potential
   >     re-users in those countries they will tell you that the data
   published
   >     is actually useless for their work, as its lacks quality
   (including but
   >     not limited to: high level of aggregation, missing details
   >     (itemisation), low granularity, not timely, not updated, no
   historic
   >     data for comparison, etc). However it is very hard to capture this
   kind
   >     of feedback into an index, as these are individual statements for
   >     individual use-cases. However not having this perspective the
   actual
   >     indexes sometimes draw a misleading picture for some countries.
   >     Interested to hear other people thoughts. All best Daniel --
   Daniel
   >     Dietrich Co-founder & Chairman Open Knowledge Foundation Germany
   >     www.okfn.de | info@okfn.de | @okfde Office:
   >
   >
   >
   > --
   > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
   Groups
   > "ODC Stewards list" group.
   > Visit this group at
   > http://groups.google.com/a/opendatacharter.net/group/odcstewardslist/.
   >
   >
   > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
   an
   > email to odcstewardslist+unsubscribe@opendatacharter.net.
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >

   --


   Phil Archer
   W3C Data Activity Lead
   http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

   http://philarcher.org
   +44 (0)7887 767755
   @philarcher1








  --
  Bernadette Farias Lóscio
  Centro de Informática
  Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2015 15:36:55 UTC