W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > September 2015

Re: DQV, DAQ and Data Cube graphs

From: Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:06:10 +0200
Message-ID: <CABP9CAEZoMZZ9CQTze-jsw9hE4FsFM_AQtQBee+n3CUq6y8hSw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Debattista, Jeremy" <Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de>
CC: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>, Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Jeremy, Riccardo,

>> Proposal 4:   define  in DQV the new class dqv:QualityDataset which
replaces daq:QualityGraph,   is defined as   subclass of qb:DataSet, but it
is not a subclass of RDFg:Graph.
> but making dqv:QualityDataset a subclass of qb:DataSet using the cube
data structure definition defined in daQ (daq:dsd).
> If what I’m saying is correct, then I think it will make daQ and DQV
compatible with each other. What do you think?

Sounds good to me! That way we will define the quality data as a Cube
dataset which has its own dsd and can be split among any number of graphs
at the discretion of the users.


DANS, Anna van Saksenlaan 51, 2593 HW Den Haag
+31(0)6 14576494

*Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS/KNAW)*[image:
http://dans.knaw.nl] <http://dans.knaw.nl>

*e-Humanities Group (KNAW)*
[image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>

*World Wide Semantic Web community*
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2015 13:07:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:41 UTC