Hi Jeremy, Riccardo, >> Proposal 4: define in DQV the new class dqv:QualityDataset which replaces daq:QualityGraph, is defined as subclass of qb:DataSet, but it is not a subclass of RDFg:Graph. > but making dqv:QualityDataset a subclass of qb:DataSet using the cube data structure definition defined in daQ (daq:dsd). > If what I’m saying is correct, then I think it will make daQ and DQV compatible with each other. What do you think? Sounds good to me! That way we will define the quality data as a Cube dataset which has its own dsd and can be split among any number of graphs at the discretion of the users. Christophe -- Onderzoeker DANS, Anna van Saksenlaan 51, 2593 HW Den Haag +31(0)6 14576494 christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl *Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS/KNAW)*[image: http://dans.knaw.nl] <http://dans.knaw.nl> *e-Humanities Group (KNAW)* [image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/> *World Wide Semantic Web community* http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2015 13:07:03 UTC