Re: DQV, DAQ and Data Cube graphs

I have to admit that my eyes start to glaze over at discussions that get into the weeds of RDF and intersecting vocabularies. I’m hopeful that, whatever we come up with for the DQV, it will be possible and straightforward for people to use it without reference to RDF terminology. Since we are talking about data in particular, and data is often represented as a graph, I’m leary of including the term “graph" anywhere in the vocabulary itself.
-Annette

--
Annette Greiner
NERSC Data and Analytics Services
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
510-495-2935

On Sep 3, 2015, at 6:06 AM, Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl> wrote:

> Hi Jeremy, Riccardo,
> 
> >> Proposal 4:   define  in DQV the new class dqv:QualityDataset which replaces daq:QualityGraph,   is defined as   subclass of qb:DataSet, but it is not a subclass of RDFg:Graph.
> > but making dqv:QualityDataset a subclass of qb:DataSet using the cube data structure definition defined in daQ (daq:dsd).
> > If what I’m saying is correct, then I think it will make daQ and DQV compatible with each other. What do you think?
> 
> Sounds good to me! That way we will define the quality data as a Cube dataset which has its own dsd and can be split among any number of graphs at the discretion of the users.
> 
> Christophe
> 
> -- 
> Onderzoeker
> DANS, Anna van Saksenlaan 51, 2593 HW Den Haag 
> +31(0)6 14576494
> christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl
> 
> Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS/KNAW)
> 
> 
> e-Humanities Group (KNAW)
> 
> 
> World Wide Semantic Web community
> http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/
> 
>