- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 15:31:12 +0100
- To: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
-1. If there are redundancies between the MD BD and the Voc BP, then maybe it's not a good sign for the MD BP themselves. They've probably be scoped too widely... But what are precisely the redundancies you've spotted? We probably need to know more. Second, I don't have a strong objection refering to the W3C Best Practices for Publishing Linked Data. But we already reached the conclusion that there was value reprising those BPs because (1) that LD BPS were not an official W3C rec and (2) this was an opportunity to write BP that would be less technically biased. I don't see why we'd revisit this position, while it already had costed us enough discussion time last year. Especially I wouldn't be ready to revisit this position based on the fact that some other part of the document would be redundant. That's not the right reason. Antoine On 5/13/15 2:58 PM, Phil Archer wrote: > +1 > > On 13/05/2015 14:25, yaso@nic.br wrote: >> Agreed, Berna >> >> +1 >> >> On 05/13/2015 10:06 AM, Eric Stephan wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> Eric S >>> >>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I'd like to propose to remove the Data Vocabularies section from the DWBP >>>> document. After reviewing the document, I believe that there is a lot of >>>> redundancy between the BP for data vocabularies and BP for metadata. >>>> Besides, IMO the creation of vocabularies is not in the scope of the >>>> document. >>>> >>>> Instead of having a section for data vocabularies, we may refer to The >>>> Standard Vocabularies section of the W3C Best Practices for Publishing >>>> Linked Data. >>>> >>>> What do you think? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Bernadette >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio >>>> Centro de Informática >>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2015 14:31:42 UTC