- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 14:58:09 +0100
- To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
+1 On 13/05/2015 14:25, yaso@nic.br wrote: > Agreed, Berna > > +1 > > On 05/13/2015 10:06 AM, Eric Stephan wrote: >> +1 >> >> Eric S >> >> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'd like to propose to remove the Data Vocabularies section from the DWBP >>> document. After reviewing the document, I believe that there is a lot of >>> redundancy between the BP for data vocabularies and BP for metadata. >>> Besides, IMO the creation of vocabularies is not in the scope of the >>> document. >>> >>> Instead of having a section for data vocabularies, we may refer to The >>> Standard Vocabularies section of the W3C Best Practices for Publishing >>> Linked Data. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Bernadette >>> >>> -- >>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio >>> Centro de Informática >>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2015 13:58:29 UTC