- From: Debattista, Jeremy <Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 14:01:16 +0000
- To: DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
I agree as well +1 Jeremy On 13 May 2015, at 15:58, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > +1 > > On 13/05/2015 14:25, yaso@nic.br wrote: >> Agreed, Berna >> >> +1 >> >> On 05/13/2015 10:06 AM, Eric Stephan wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> Eric S >>> >>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I'd like to propose to remove the Data Vocabularies section from the DWBP >>>> document. After reviewing the document, I believe that there is a lot of >>>> redundancy between the BP for data vocabularies and BP for metadata. >>>> Besides, IMO the creation of vocabularies is not in the scope of the >>>> document. >>>> >>>> Instead of having a section for data vocabularies, we may refer to The >>>> Standard Vocabularies section of the W3C Best Practices for Publishing >>>> Linked Data. >>>> >>>> What do you think? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Bernadette >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio >>>> Centro de Informática >>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>> >> > > -- > > > Phil Archer > W3C Data Activity Lead > http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1 >
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2015 14:01:54 UTC