- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 09:13:16 -0700
- To: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>, DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Well, any file can be expressed as numeric data, but I'm sure neither of us wants to be that general about our definition. I think media files can be data even when not expressed as numeric data, but only if they were created for the purpose of recording observations. -Annette Sent from a keyboard-challenged device On Mar 28, 2015, at 1:20 AM, Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com> wrote: >> >> I think documents are generally not data. For the others, I think it > depends >> on intention. Sometimes audio, image, or video are data, for example in >> social science research where interactions between subjects are > videotaped, >> or in neuroscience where audio recordings of speech are captured. I think >> it's pretty rare for people to want to publish those media files as raw > data >> rather than as coded numeric values. Usually, I think, audio, image, and >> video are *enrichments* of data, but again, it depends on the intention. >> > > I am still unsure how we determine what is data and what is not. > You seem to argue that audio, image and video are only data if what is > recorded can be expressed as numeric, tabular data. > Is it then agreed that we only consider spreadsheet-like data? > > All the other things, text documents, Web pages, video feeds, webinar > captures, courseware, photographs of buildings, code lists, SKOS concept > schemes etc. etc. are then out of scope. > > I would support such a definition. > > Makx. >
Received on Saturday, 28 March 2015 16:13:49 UTC