- From: Laufer <laufer@globo.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 09:08:06 -0300
- To: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
- Cc: DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+pXJihsVJFn8SOi3Kb2+idt5GugW5BcOmEfSaKv0W3+2Ye_gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Makx, I cannot see in our document we saying to people to not publish metadata. On the contrary, the first BP in the document is to publish metadata. I think we all agree (in general) about this matter. What we need is a very good text in the introduction of our document summarizing the text of this thread. Best Regards, Laufer Em sábado, 28 de março de 2015, Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com> escreveu: > > > > Anyone publishing tabular data in a PDF really needs to have a word with > > themselves. > > > > Can we maybe try not to get into these kinds of absolute, unqualified > statements? > > I agree that if someone has tubular data and creates a PDF that contains > only a table with just that table is not doing anyone a service. However, > if > such a table is included in a document that contains explanations and > analysis of the data, aimed at a human readership, I don't think PDF is a > bad choice. Of course, the data in the table should be published in a > better > machine-readable format alongside the PDF. What I would not want to see is > that we encourage service providers to publish data only as CSV and > discontinue publication of any human-readable information. > > As Annette says, it depends on the intention. > > Makx. > > > > -- . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. .
Received on Saturday, 28 March 2015 12:08:34 UTC