+1 too to Laufer, Annette, Phil, etc. For actual data publishing, images from satellites and microscopes make > sense. If the WG wants to include documents in the classic sense of > somthing that can be printed out then we should explain why HTML is better > than ODT or PDF and why PDF is better than .doc which is better than > .docx. Isn't it "docx better than doc" ? But if those docs include tabular data as data or as graphs, then > that data should be published separately alongside the doc. This is what > researchers are increasingly encouraged, and in some cases forced, to do. > Note that for NWO fundings researchers are forced not to publish the data but to send it to a trusted archive. Hence the need for BPs on data preservation ;-) Christophe -- Onderzoeker DANS, Anna van Saksenlaan 51, 2593 HW Den Haag +31(0)6 14576494 christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl *Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS/KNAW)*[image: http://dans.knaw.nl] <http://dans.knaw.nl> *e-Humanities Group (KNAW)* [image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/> *World Wide Semantic Web community* http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/
Received on Saturday, 28 March 2015 07:38:32 UTC