- From: Ig Ibert Bittencourt <ig.ibert@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:27:09 -0300
- To: "Adriano C. Machado Pereira" <adrianoc@dcc.ufmg.br>
- Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>
- Message-ID: <CAKNDvRVkb8PW=UDq164c2jS4zGD3sJ9cUwU7U8_a4j5UX91VBQ@mail.gmail.com>
+1 On Mar 26, 2015 9:01 PM, "Adriano C. Machado Pereira" <adrianoc@dcc.ufmg.br> wrote: > +1 also! > Regards! > Adriano. > > > Adriano C. Machado Pereira. > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Bart van Leeuwen < > bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl> wrote: > >> +1 >> Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote on 26-03-2015 17:13:52: >> >> > A long long time ago I raised an issue which should really have been an >> > action item to consider whether the use case doc sufficiently called >> for >> > code lists to be used where possible cf. free text. >> > >> > We have a requirement at [1] called R-VocabReference that is defined as: >> > >> > Existing reference vocabularies should be reused where possible >> > >> > It is motivated by a long list of use cases that, as far as I can see, >> > do not explicitly call for the use of controlled vocabularies but most, >> > if not al, imply it. For example, the Wind Characterization Study UC >> > says "The DMF catalog relies on linked open vocabularies and domain >> > vocabularies to make the study data searchable." The Open City data >> > Pipeline says "Added value comes from comparable open datasets being >> > combined." >> > >> > I would put "using code lists/preferred values from a list rather than >> a >> > free text box" is a truth we hold to be self-evident and therefore we >> > probably have enough evidence to include this in the BPs? >> > >> > So my proposal is, rather than creating/finding another use case that >> > calls explicitly for the use of code lists, simply to expand the >> > definition of this requirement thus: >> > >> > R-VocabReference >> > Existing reference vocabularies and code lists should be reused >> where >> > possible. >> > >> > i.e. just insert "and code lists". >> > >> > WDYT? >> > >> > Phil >> > >> > Tracker: this is issue-48 >> > >> > >> > >> > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp-ucr/#R-VocabReference >> > -- >> > >> > >> > Phil Archer >> > W3C Data Activity Lead >> > http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ >> > >> > http://philarcher.org >> > +44 (0)7887 767755 >> > @philarcher1 >> > >> > >
Received on Friday, 27 March 2015 00:27:36 UTC