Re: ISSUE-53: Whether sla is/can be thought of as part of the licence or whether it needs to be pulled out spearately?

“Data should be suitable for industry reuse” is how that one is defined. To me, that seems like too large a requirement to give as a single thing. We have many best practices that define better how to make data reusable. I also dislike seeing the word “industry” in there specifically, since reuse should be possible by non-industrial entities as well.
-Annette
--
Annette Greiner
NERSC Data and Analytics Services
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
510-495-2935

On Mar 26, 2015, at 8:53 AM, Newton Calegari <newton@nic.br> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> We are running over some Issues trying to end the discussion on those that can be closed. 
> And when we were trying to close the Issue-53 we faced this point:
> 
> The Industry Reuse Requirements (4.1.7) is in the UCR Doc [1], but it isn’t listed as a Challenge [2]. Is it in the scope of the BP Document ?
> 
> If it is in the scope, does the SLA should be defined as a type of metadata?
> 
> Obs: Issue-54 [3] is also related to this discussion.
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp-ucr/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp-ucr/#general-challenges
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/54
> 
> Newton
>