- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:58:54 +0000
- To: Caroline Burle <cburle@nic.br>
- CC: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
OK, I've done some digging and I *think* we have a working tracker. I think the problem was that I included spaces in the short name of the doc thinking it was just a text field (it isn't). So, I have started all over again. You can follow the link from the wiki menu bar to https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/ where you'll now see a list of two documents with the same name. Ignore the first - that's the old one that doesn't work. The second one, which I have linked directly from the wiki at https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Main_Page#Best_Practices seems like it might work. The new list is at https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/ There you'll see 4 comments in the tracker, the three from Andrea and DanBri's. Can you try adding another, presumably Herbert van Stompel's and see if it works for you? If so then we're up and running... Phil. On 26/03/2015 14:47, Caroline Burle wrote: > Dear Phil, > > Bernadette, Newton and I are trying to include the comments in the > Comment Tracker, but we are having some trouble with the tool. > > We think the main problem is that the tool is not linking the BP > Document with the comments. Furthermore, at first it would appear all > the sections of the BP document on "Section of the document concerned", > now it does not appear anymore. Finally, we added 4 comments[1-4] that > are shown together when we click to "View Comments"[5], but the comment > you have posted before is not there. > > Could you help us with it? > > Thank you! Kind regards, > Caroline > > [1] LC-2998 <https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/BP/2998> > [2] LC-3000 <https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/BP/3000> > [3] LC-2999 <https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/BP/2999> > [4] LC-3001 <https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/BP/3001> > [5] https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/BP/ > > On 13/03/15 09:35, Phil Archer wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I took an action item last week to look into options for tracking >> comments. As a follow up, and with help from my colleague Dom, I've >> configured a comment tracking tool we have, see [1]. >> >> For each comment received, someone, usually a document editor, adds >> the comment to the system, referring to the comment's URL from the >> mail archive. They should classify the comment as one of >> >> substantive >> editorial >> typo >> question >> general comment >> undefined (try not to use this one) >> >> There may be more than one comment per e-mail. I have loaded an >> example [2]. >> >> The WG can then review each comment and record its resolution (all of >> which is part of the public archive of course). >> >> HTH >> >> Phil. >> >> [1] https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/ >> [2] https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/BP%20Doc%20FPWD/ >> >> For Tracker: This is ACTION-142 >> >> > > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 15:58:43 UTC