- From: Newton Calegari <newton@nic.br>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 19:45:47 -0300
- To: DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com>, DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias.moro@gmail.com>
- Message-Id: <12549193-F0C2-4297-9C84-1D70F1FCCEAC@nic.br>
Hi all, In order to support our discussion about BPs on tomorrow call, we propose bellow some Issues to discuss and try to close them tomorrow. BP1 - Document data [1] Issue-142: Multilingualism [2] Issue-76: What advice we give about publish metadata? [3] Issue-136: Proposal for Metadata BP (Actually, the proposal made by Carlos Iglesias is related to 3 BP’s we are going to discuss) [4] BP2 - Use machine-readable formats to provide metadata [5] q+: which RFC term should we use in the BP description: SHOULD or MUST? Issue-138: Should we split Use machine-readable standardized data formats BP in tow? (This issue can be closed because the BPs are already splited) [6] BP3 - Use standard terms to define metadata [7] Issue-133: SHOULD or MUST? [8] Issue-139: Carlos Iglesias’ suggestion to change the “Possible Approach to Implementation” of BP3 [9] Cheers, Newton [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#DocumentMetadata <http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#DocumentMetadata> [2] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/142 <http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/142> [3] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/76 <http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/76> [4] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/136 <http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/136> [5] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#ProvideMetadataMachine <http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#ProvideMetadataMachine> [6] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/138 <http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/138> [7] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#ProvideMetadataStandardized <http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#ProvideMetadataStandardized> [8] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/133 <http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/133> [9] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/139 <http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/139> > Em 12/03/2015, à(s) 13:28, <Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu> <Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu> escreveu: > > Is the time conversion correct? > > 14:00 CET (Luxembourg time) > > The safest is to fix the meeting according to UTC time. > > Regards > > -----Original Message----- > From: Deirdre Lee [mailto:deirdre@derilinx.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 3:19 PM > To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > Subject: Agenda for tomorrow's telco > > Hi all, > > The agenda for tomorrow's telco is available at > https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20150313 > > Last week we discussed a new structure for the weekly calls, where we'd > dedicate 30 mins to BP, 15 mins to data quality doc and 15 mins to data > usage doc. > We'll give that a go tomorrow and see how much content we can get > through and issues we can resolve. > > Talk to you then. > Deidre > > > ---------------------------------------- > Deirdre Lee, Director > Derilinx - Linked & Open Data Solutions > > Web: www.derilinx.com > Email: deirdre@derilinx.com > Tel: +353 (0)1 254 4316 > Mob: +353 (0)87 417 2318 > Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/ > Twitter: @derilinx > >
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2015 22:46:19 UTC