Re: Editable version of DUV model Action-178

Hi Eric,

I have just one comment:


> Hi Eric,
>
> Thank you very much for the examples! They are really useful! My comments
> are inline.
>
>>
>> Example 1:  Jian wants to provide "readme" information that includes
>> recommended uses and some background information with a previously
>> published climate model diagnostics dataset
>> http://example.com/atmos/sgp-uncertainty/ .  To do this Jian publishes
>> "duv:UsageAnnotation".
>>
>
> Yes. In this case, Jian creates an annotation that describes a specific
> type of DatasetUsage (ex: duv:GeneralInformation). However, the current
> version of the model doesn't have this type of DatasetUsage.Should we
> include a new subclass?
>
> I was thinking this was UsageAnnotation, no?
>


I was thinking UsageAnnotation as a way to annotate a dataset with
information about its usage. In this case, UsageAnnotation may be used to
annotate a dataset with information about applications that use the dataset
as well as to describe possible citations. The idea is to have a way to
associate a dataset with information about how the dataset has being used.

For example, a consumer uses the duv:Application to describe how he is
using the dataset in a given application and the publisher uses
duv:UsageAnnotation to describe who is using the dataset. Maybe, we can say
that a duv:UsageAnnotation is a set of one or more duv:DatasetUsage.

Cheers,
Bernadette






>
>
>
>>
>> Example 2:  Laura has a perl script 2d-plotter.pl that creates quarterly
>> (3 month) jpeg plots from netcdf files contained in the model diagnostics
>> dataset http://example.com/atmos/sgp-uncertainty/ . Laura makes the perl
>> script available in github and publishes "duv:Application" that associates
>> 2d-plotter.pl with the dataset.
>>
>
> Yes. From the point of view of Laura, she publishes a duv:Application.
> However, from the point of view of the Publisher, it is also possible to
> associate a duv:UsageAnnotation to the dataset in order to provide
> information about who is using the dataset. Does it make sense for you
>
> Yes
>
>
>> Example 3:  Matt publishes a peer reviewed technical report on errors and
>> imprecision found in the model diagnostics dataset over limited time
>> periods when the observational data was collected. Matt publishes
>> "duv:Citation" that associates a citation reference to the technical report.
>>
>
> Yes! This is similar to Example 2.
>
>
>>
>> Is this how you are thinking it would work?  I am beginning to wonder if
>> we really need the DatasetUsage class, I don't know what this adds.  It is
>> helpful in the conceptual model, but in practice it seems like it
>> unnecessary overhead.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>
> I agree with you that in practice maybe it won't be necessary to have the
> DatasetUsage class. However, let's wait a little more before to remove it
> :) Let's see if it is really unnecessary.
>
> I am fine with this, thanks!
>
>
> Cheers,
> Bernadette
>
>
>> Eric S
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <
>> bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>> The idea of having the class duv:UsageAnnotation is to have a way to
>>> describe how datasets can be annotated with information about their usage.
>>> In this case, I don't see it as a subclass of duv:DatasetUsage.
>>>
>>> We can also have a similar way to annotate a dataset with information
>>> about feedback gathered from consumers.
>>>
>>> I think that in the dataset usage vocab, we should consider two
>>> scenarios. The first one is how data consumers will provide information
>>> about the dataset usage and feedback. The second one is how a dataset can
>>> be annotated with such information. Does it make sense for you?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Bernadette
>>>
>>> 2015-04-22 9:14 GMT-03:00 Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Bernadette,
>>>>
>>>> I really like where you put data citation as a subclass to
>>>> duv:DatasetUsage (I changed the class name, do you agree?), it seems like
>>>> UsageAnnotation could be a subclass to DatasetUsage.  What are your
>>>> thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Eric S
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <
>>>> bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ok Eric! Thank you!
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>> Bernadette
>>>>>
>>>>> 2015-04-22 8:55 GMT-03:00 Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you Bernadette,  it looks great.  I'm just responding with the
>>>>>> action number to record your email in the action tracker.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eric S
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <
>>>>>> bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now we have an editable version of the DUV model available on google
>>>>>>> drive [1].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please feel free to make comments and updates!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>>>> Bernadette
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1aq3vPcoj0SPs5BispD6umQNejrBTwkhsSYu6Y1adUjw/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>>>>>>> Centro de Informática
>>>>>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>>>>> Centro de Informática
>>>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>>> Centro de Informática
>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>


-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------