Re: Editable version of DUV model Action-178

Thanks so much Bernadette!  My comments below.

Eric 
Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 22, 2015, at 7:18 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote:
> 
> Hi Eric,
> 
> Thank you very much for the examples! They are really useful! My comments are inline.
>> 
>> Example 1:  Jian wants to provide "readme" information that includes recommended uses and some background information with a previously published climate model diagnostics dataset http://example.com/atmos/sgp-uncertainty/ .  To do this Jian publishes "duv:UsageAnnotation".
> 
> Yes. In this case, Jian creates an annotation that describes a specific type of DatasetUsage (ex: duv:GeneralInformation). However, the current version of the model doesn't have this type of DatasetUsage.Should we include a new subclass?
I was thinking this was UsageAnnotation, no?
>  
>> 
>> Example 2:  Laura has a perl script 2d-plotter.pl that creates quarterly (3 month) jpeg plots from netcdf files contained in the model diagnostics dataset http://example.com/atmos/sgp-uncertainty/ . Laura makes the perl script available in github and publishes "duv:Application" that associates 2d-plotter.pl with the dataset.
> 
> Yes. From the point of view of Laura, she publishes a duv:Application. However, from the point of view of the Publisher, it is also possible to associate a duv:UsageAnnotation to the dataset in order to provide information about who is using the dataset. Does it make sense for you
Yes
>> 
>> Example 3:  Matt publishes a peer reviewed technical report on errors and imprecision found in the model diagnostics dataset over limited time periods when the observational data was collected. Matt publishes "duv:Citation" that associates a citation reference to the technical report.
> 
> Yes! This is similar to Example 2.
>  
>> 
>> Is this how you are thinking it would work?  I am beginning to wonder if we really need the DatasetUsage class, I don't know what this adds.  It is helpful in the conceptual model, but in practice it seems like it unnecessary overhead.
>> 
>> What do you think?
> 
> I agree with you that in practice maybe it won't be necessary to have the DatasetUsage class. However, let's wait a little more before to remove it :) Let's see if it is really unnecessary.
> 
I am fine with this, thanks!

> 
> Cheers,
> Bernadette
> 
>> 
>> Eric S
>> 
>> 
>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote:
>>> Hi Eric,
>>> 
>>> The idea of having the class duv:UsageAnnotation is to have a way to describe how datasets can be annotated with information about their usage.  In this case, I don't see it as a subclass of duv:DatasetUsage.
>>> 
>>> We can also have a similar way to annotate a dataset with information about feedback gathered from consumers. 
>>> 
>>> I think that in the dataset usage vocab, we should consider two scenarios. The first one is how data consumers will provide information about the dataset usage and feedback. The second one is how a dataset can be annotated with such information. Does it make sense for you?
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Bernadette 
>>> 
>>> 2015-04-22 9:14 GMT-03:00 Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>:
>>> 
>>>> Bernadette,
>>>> 
>>>> I really like where you put data citation as a subclass to duv:DatasetUsage (I changed the class name, do you agree?), it seems like UsageAnnotation could be a subclass to DatasetUsage.  What are your thoughts?
>>>> 
>>>> Eric S
>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote:
>>>>> ok Eric! Thank you!
>>>>> 
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>> Bernadette
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2015-04-22 8:55 GMT-03:00 Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thank you Bernadette,  it looks great.  I'm just responding with the action number to record your email in the action tracker.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Eric S
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Now we have an editable version of the DUV model available on google drive [1].
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Please feel free to make comments and updates!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>>>> Bernadette
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [1] https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1aq3vPcoj0SPs5BispD6umQNejrBTwkhsSYu6Y1adUjw/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>>>>>>> Centro de Informática
>>>>>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>>>>> Centro de Informática
>>>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>>> Centro de Informática
>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------