Re: Editable version of DUV model Action-178

Hi Eric,

Thank you very much for the examples! They are really useful! My comments
are inline.

>
> Example 1:  Jian wants to provide "readme" information that includes
> recommended uses and some background information with a previously
> published climate model diagnostics dataset
> http://example.com/atmos/sgp-uncertainty/ .  To do this Jian publishes
> "duv:UsageAnnotation".
>

Yes. In this case, Jian creates an annotation that describes a specific
type of DatasetUsage (ex: duv:GeneralInformation). However, the current
version of the model doesn't have this type of DatasetUsage.Should we
include a new subclass?


>
> Example 2:  Laura has a perl script 2d-plotter.pl that creates quarterly
> (3 month) jpeg plots from netcdf files contained in the model diagnostics
> dataset http://example.com/atmos/sgp-uncertainty/ . Laura makes the perl
> script available in github and publishes "duv:Application" that associates
> 2d-plotter.pl with the dataset.
>

Yes. From the point of view of Laura, she publishes a duv:Application.
However, from the point of view of the Publisher, it is also possible to
associate a duv:UsageAnnotation to the dataset in order to provide
information about who is using the dataset. Does it make sense for you?

>
> Example 3:  Matt publishes a peer reviewed technical report on errors and
> imprecision found in the model diagnostics dataset over limited time
> periods when the observational data was collected. Matt publishes
> "duv:Citation" that associates a citation reference to the technical report.
>

Yes! This is similar to Example 2.


>
> Is this how you are thinking it would work?  I am beginning to wonder if
> we really need the DatasetUsage class, I don't know what this adds.  It is
> helpful in the conceptual model, but in practice it seems like it
> unnecessary overhead.
>
> What do you think?
>

I agree with you that in practice maybe it won't be necessary to have the
DatasetUsage class. However, let's wait a little more before to remove it
:) Let's see if it is really unnecessary.


Cheers,
Bernadette


> Eric S
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> The idea of having the class duv:UsageAnnotation is to have a way to
>> describe how datasets can be annotated with information about their usage.
>> In this case, I don't see it as a subclass of duv:DatasetUsage.
>>
>> We can also have a similar way to annotate a dataset with information
>> about feedback gathered from consumers.
>>
>> I think that in the dataset usage vocab, we should consider two
>> scenarios. The first one is how data consumers will provide information
>> about the dataset usage and feedback. The second one is how a dataset can
>> be annotated with such information. Does it make sense for you?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bernadette
>>
>> 2015-04-22 9:14 GMT-03:00 Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Bernadette,
>>>
>>> I really like where you put data citation as a subclass to
>>> duv:DatasetUsage (I changed the class name, do you agree?), it seems like
>>> UsageAnnotation could be a subclass to DatasetUsage.  What are your
>>> thoughts?
>>>
>>> Eric S
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <
>>> bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ok Eric! Thank you!
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>> Bernadette
>>>>
>>>> 2015-04-22 8:55 GMT-03:00 Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Thank you Bernadette,  it looks great.  I'm just responding with the
>>>>> action number to record your email in the action tracker.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Eric S
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <
>>>>> bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now we have an editable version of the DUV model available on google
>>>>>> drive [1].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please feel free to make comments and updates!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>>> Bernadette
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1aq3vPcoj0SPs5BispD6umQNejrBTwkhsSYu6Y1adUjw/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>>>>>> Centro de Informática
>>>>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>>>> Centro de Informática
>>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>> Centro de Informática
>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
>


-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------