+1 to Jeremy, Ghislain and Carlos, I think this can be solved with alignment techniques (owl:equivalentClass or owl:sameAs) []'s Ig 2015-04-17 9:55 GMT-03:00 Carlos Iglesias <contact@carlosiglesias.es>: > Also note that void restricts itself to LD while DCAT is for more general > purpose, something also desirable for our objectives IMO. > > Best, > CI. > > > On 17 April 2015 at 14:50, Ghislain Atemezing < > auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> [jumping here to clarify something regarding DCAT adoption w.r.t LOD >> stats] >> >> Le 17 avr. 2015 à 14:03, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> a écrit : >> >> "excluded", am I right? For example in [1] they say that around 14% of >> the crawled datasets use void (where there is an equivalent void:Dataset >> [2]) whilst only around 6% use dcat. >> >> >> Yes, but you have to take into account the following: >> - DCAT was REC on January 2014 >> - LOD stat (2014) started to be crawled around March/April 2014. So, >> we could not expect to have many datasets there using DCAT. >> >> We all know the time it takes for a technology to be adopted, at least a >> year. IMO, I strongly encourage the use of DCAT in this vocabulary. >> >> Best, >> Ghislain >> > > > > -- > --- > > Carlos Iglesias. > Open Data Consultant. > +34 687 917 759 > contact@carlosiglesias.es > @carlosiglesias > http://es.linkedin.com/in/carlosiglesiasmoro/en > -- Ig Ibert Bittencourt Professor Adjunto III - Instituto de Computação/Universidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL) Vice-Coordenador da Comissão Especial de Informática na Educação Líder do Centro de Excelência em Tecnologias Sociais Co-fundador da Startup MeuTutor Soluções Educacionais LTDA.
Received on Friday, 17 April 2015 13:03:03 UTC