Also note that void restricts itself to LD while DCAT is for more general purpose, something also desirable for our objectives IMO. Best, CI. On 17 April 2015 at 14:50, Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr> wrote: > Hi all, > [jumping here to clarify something regarding DCAT adoption w.r.t LOD > stats] > > Le 17 avr. 2015 à 14:03, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> a écrit : > > "excluded", am I right? For example in [1] they say that around 14% of the > crawled datasets use void (where there is an equivalent void:Dataset [2]) > whilst only around 6% use dcat. > > > Yes, but you have to take into account the following: > - DCAT was REC on January 2014 > - LOD stat (2014) started to be crawled around March/April 2014. So, we > could not expect to have many datasets there using DCAT. > > We all know the time it takes for a technology to be adopted, at least a > year. IMO, I strongly encourage the use of DCAT in this vocabulary. > > Best, > Ghislain > -- --- Carlos Iglesias. Open Data Consultant. +34 687 917 759 contact@carlosiglesias.es @carlosiglesias http://es.linkedin.com/in/carlosiglesiasmoro/en
Received on Friday, 17 April 2015 12:55:56 UTC