- From: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
- Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 14:56:27 +0200
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOHhXmTWcvh3Lnfr1Mtf4q=v2Q=ZjhUG9P9zs_+kYC6twnOgeg@mail.gmail.com>
Dear all, I have only recently joined to the DWBP, and unfortunately I did't make for the last vocabularies call. However, after reading the minutes from that call, I realised that probably there is some room for contributing with novel use cases. Have I got it wrong? You can find my use cases proposal below, I hope it is of some interest for the working group. Of course I am open to revise the attached use case accordingly to any template or comments you might have. Regards, Riccardo --------------- *LuSTRE: **Linked Thesaurus fRamework for Environment* *Contributor: Riccardo Albertoni (CNR-IMATI)* *City, country: Genoa, Italy* *Overview:* LusTRE is a framework that aims at combining existing environmental thesauri to support in the management of environmental resources. It considers the heterogeneity in scopes and levels of abstraction of existing environmental thesauri as an asset when managing environmental data, thus it aims at exploiting linked data best practice SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organisation System) and RDF (Resource Description Framework) in order to provide a multi-thesauri solution for INSPIRE data themes related to nature conservation. LusTRE is intended to support in metadata compilation and data/service discovery according to the ISO 19115/19119. The development of LusTRE includes (i) a review of existing environmental thesauri and their characteristics in term of multilingualism, openness and quality; (ii) the publication of environmental thesauri as linked data; (iii) the creation of linksets among published thesauri as well as well-known thesauri exposed as linked data by third-parties, (iv) the exploitation of aforementioned linksets to take advantage of thesaurus complementarities in terms of domain specificity and multilingualism. Quality of thesauri and linksets is an issue that is not necessary limited to the initial review of thesauri, it should be monitored and promptly documented. In this respect, a standardised vocabulary for expressing dataset and linkset quality would be recommendable to make accessible the quality assessment of thesauri included in LusTRE. Considered the importance of linkset quality in the achievement of an effective cross-walking among thesauri, further services for assessing the quality of linksets are going to be investigated. Such services might be developed extending the measure proposed in [Albertoni et al, 2013], <http://www.edbt.org/Proceedings/2013-Genova/papers/workshops/a8-albertoni.pdf> so that, linksets among thesauri can be assessed considering their potential when exploiting interlinks for thesaurus complementarities. LusTRE’s is currently under development within the EU project eENVplus (CIP-ICT-PSP grant No. 325232), it extends the common thesaurus framework [De Martino et al. 2011] <http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.1676> previously resulting from the EU project NatureSDIplus (ECP-2007-GEO-317007). *Elements:* · *Domains*: Management of Environmental Metadata · *Obligation/motivation*: Activity foreseen in EU project which encourages the adoption of INSPIRE metadata implementation rules. · *Usage*: · *Quality*: largely variable · *Size*: small most of the thesauri size is less than 100MB · *Type/format*: LusTRE publishes SKOS/RDF, but the thesauri considered for inclusion in LusTRE are not necessarily in that format · *Rate of change*: Depends on the thesaurus. · *Data lifespan*: Life span of eENVPlus project ranges in 2013 – 2015, by the way, the framework is going to be maintained after the project is concluded. · *Potential audience*: Public administrations involved in the cataloguing of geographical information and Spatial Data Infrastructure. Decision makers searching in Spatial Data Infrastructure. *Positive aspects:* The use case includes publication as well as consumptions of data. *Negative aspects:* *Challenges:* Data provenance. Versioning mechanisms. Diversity and (sometimes) complexity of Licenses. Issues pertaining to multilingualism. Assessment and documentation of dataset and linkset quality. On 4 September 2014 18:55, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > A few of us gathered today to talk about the vocabularies work. It was a > positive meeting with a good feel of "OK, let's get back to work..." > > Thanks Eric for chairing. > > The minutes are available at http://www.w3.org/2014/09/04- > dwbp-minutes.html and you may notice a number of action items! > > Phil. > > -- > > > Phil Archer > W3C Data Activity Lead > http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1 > > > -- > This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean. > Click here to report this message as spam. > Clicca il link per segnalare questo messaggio come spam. > http://mailscanner.ge.cnr.it/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=9FC45283B8.13639 > > >
Received on Monday, 8 September 2014 13:20:49 UTC