- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 16:29:41 +0100
- To: Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
The aim of the list is really the same as the aim of the separate calls - we'll need detailed discussion on the vocab and that won't be of interest to some member of the WG for whom it becomes inbox noise. Now I have a problem... you're right that we should set up a new product for each of the deliverables in the tracker (this WG is unusual in that so far we haven't raised any issues but that's going to change as we get into detailed work). When you set up a new product (and yes, you can do that just as well as I can) you need to specify the associated mailing list so... I'll defer setting up the product until we're more sure which list to associate with the Q&G vocab :-( Phil. On 30/05/2014 15:28, Bart van Leeuwen wrote: > During the meeting with Antoine we were wondering what the purpose of the > vocabulary mailing list is. > I couldn't find any discussion on that subject and Antoine and I were not > conclusive as of which emails should go to which list if we would discuss > vocabulary document contents. > Certainly now that in todays call we agreed that UC&R and Vocabs will have > a close relation separating the two emails stream makes less sense for me > but I might have overlooked a very good reason. > > Could anyone fill me in on this? > > Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards > Bart van Leeuwen > > ############################################################## > # twitter: @semanticfire > # netage.nl > # http://netage.nl > # Enschedepad 76 > # 1324 GJ Almere > # The Netherlands > # tel. +31(0)36-5347479 > ############################################################## > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Friday, 30 May 2014 15:30:11 UTC