- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 19:38:55 +0200
- To: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
+1 Antoine On 5/29/14 7:09 PM, Makx Dekkers wrote: > I was just wondering whether CC REL > http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CC_REL is a reasonably simple approach > that can be recommended, or at least mentioned as a candidate for best > practice? > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Antoine Isaac [mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl] >> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 6:51 PM >> To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org >> Subject: Re: Two blog posts that may be of interest >> >> Hi Steve, >> >> I've never said (and I believe neither have Leigh) that machine >> readability is useless. What we're questioning is the relevance of >> super-complex frameworks. >> Most observed cases of data re-use cry for simple conditions. If one >> has to fulfill 15 different conditions that are hard and absolutely >> not standardized in order to re-use a dataset, one will probably >> abstain, even if these conditions have been described in a machine- >> readable way. >> >> Antoine >> >> On 5/28/14 11:39 PM, Steven Adler wrote: >>> I disagree. We are a long way from universal license terms and >> machine readability of terms and conditions would provide benefits to >> large and small data consumers alike. >>> > > >
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2014 17:39:27 UTC